Abba’s Apple


Author: Christopher B. Copas

"Abba’s Apple"












ISRAEL, in whom God’s Word is Chosen—

The Chosen of God, in whom is God’s Word.


The beating of my own heart—

A heart that follows thee wherever thou goest.

My thoughts that are continually upon thee—

My soul that cleaves to thee,

Like a mother to her only child;

My life that cleaves to your destiny,

Like the sun cleaves to the dawn.

For I shall never stop defending thee,

O Zion, The Eternal Seed.

For I shall never, ever depart from thee,

O Israel, My Great Contender.

For I shall never abandon thee nor forsake thy children,

Because I love thee;

Because thou loves Me.


For there will come a day when there shall be no fear.

For even when evil seems to encompass thee about,

It shall last but for a moment.

Though many protest,

Their protest shall come to naught.

Thou shalt no longer wonder,

"Where is our God?"


Hashem is above you, among you, and within you.

His SPIRIT is ABOVE you,

His ANGELS are AMONG you—

His LOVE lives WITHIN you.

For the energy of God has become your energy;

For the Spirit of God has become as your own.

It exists in every weapon that you possess;

It exists in every book that you have made,

And in every language that thou speakest.

It exists in every warm and firm yet gentle embrace.

It exists in every boisterous laugh and radiant smile—

It exists in every tender emotion,

And upon your every face.

It exists inside of every room, and within every office.

It exists even upon one’s roof.

For the energy of God is deep within you—

For deep within you is the energy of God.

And the Holiest One shall fight for you,

And you shall overcome all that stands in your way—

In the way of your joy—

In the way of your peace—

In the way of your love—

In the way of your happiness.

For Hashem shall one day prevent

Even your tears

From being shed.

For they shall one day be shed no more.

No more death shall thou thus grieve.

No more shall thou be alarmed or crestfallen.

No more shall the enemy hiss at thee—

Without the incandescent wrath of His furious rebuke.

No more shall you be a reproach, even to your enemies.

For your enemies are my enemies—

For your grief is my grief—

For your tears are my tears.

For Hashem has spoken it.

For it has now been written,

And it shall not return void.

For once it is bestowed,

It shall be kept— 

In your hearts,

In your souls

In the prayers and thoughts

Of a thousand midnight labours,

You shall remain forever whole

You shall be near unto your Saviour.

For one day it shall be—

No longer just a dream.

UNTO ISRAEL, whom I love for forever and ever:

A love that has no beginning,

Because it has no end

Because that love is from The One, EL-ELYON Himself

For His Name is also One—




Your Apple Is The One Indomitable Israel,

Your Anointed And Chosen Seed.

For FOREVER And EVER And EVER We Shall Remain

Faithful, True, And Free—


Christopher B. Copas


22 Responses to “Abba’s Apple”

  1. Thank you. Nice verses, nice picture …. but the star in the center is a ‘satanic star’ that should not even be on the flag of Israel. How does YAHWEH feel about it? Check AMOS: 5:26 “You also carried along Sikkuth your king and Kiyyun, your images, the STAR of your gods which you made for yourselves.(NASB)

    • hi Jes

      Well….Israel is using a star for God’s glory now…..and it wanted to show honor to God in its flag….

      the main part of the flag is a prayer shawl.

      the star is the star they associate with David, who was a king close to God’s heart.

      so that is what the flag is supposed to represent.

      therefore the meaning is updated…and not related to your concern.

      • Hi Marianne,
        I can see that you do a lot of research which does take a lot of effort as I do the same, and I do like majority of your articles very much. However, I’m not concerned about the flag but the STAR on practically everything that is Jewish including Jewelry which I stay away from because without doubt this star is a very ancient,HIGHLY satanic STAR and has nothing to do with King David but it was brought about by King Solomon who was deeply into witchcraft even sacrificing his own babies to the ‘baal god’ on high places. That ‘star’ then became the ‘seal of Solomon’ … Also did you know that the Israeli flag was supposed to have the Menorah on it but was changed for this ‘star’ by whom? Think about it for a while … don’t take my word for it but please do further research. I have lots of info I’ll share but only after the PESACH as it’s an important preparation for me.

        The scripture I quoted is not my own but the very WORDS of YAHWEH and I know from His Word that He never changes and so this ‘star’ will always be an abomination in His Holy Eyes until Yeshua Messiah comes and destroys it … Praise His Holy Name…YAHMEIN.

        • hi Jes

          Well, again, what God created for good, Satan has taken for himself and corrupted.

          in the beginning, stars, trees, flowers, etc all represented God’s creation.

          The intention for the star was to glorify God.

          The Jews were trying to do the same, after being recovered from the holocaust.

          The star is there on the flag now for that reason.

          it is really time we take back what the devil has stolen and wack him with it.!!

      • Hmmmm

    • wow, even people who are supposed to be on God’s side, Christians, have to hold to double standards against Israel. Sorry folks, the Satanists used the 5 pointed star far more than the star of David (if at all?), and there are only about 50 of those on the American flag. Israelite warriors found that their shields were much more resistant when strengthened on the six corners. I don’t know if it was first a spiritual picture or a practical one, but it’s been called since before the English language came to be מגן דוד magen dawid, the shield of David. I don’t know if he himself did it, if he invented the idea, or if they gave him credit since they wanted to honor such a holy king. It’s possible that God showed him the design, who knows! The important thing is the arrogance of the accuser (שטן Satan in Hebrew) will cause people who don’t know any Jewish history, and read a translation to think they know the hidden interpretation of this text. There’s nothing wrong with reading translations, I recommend it unless someone uses Hebrew in day to day life or wants to devote their lives to study. You can’t, however, nit pick words from a translated text and try to discover a hidden meaning. Because if you read the original text, it would be obvious to you that it was translated properly- people worshiped the star ITSELF, you know, like those shiny things in the sky, unless you live in cities and can’t see them. In biblical Hebrew, there wasn’t really a difference between planets and stars, everything was כוכבים cochavim/ celestial bodies. I don’t know if there is a tradition of which star this was referring to, but many cultures worshiped stars, planets, etc, see Astrolatry.
      this generation we have video games, i-pods, and smart phones, last generation they had sex, drugs, and rock and roll. The biggest problems in the ancient world were idol worship, idolatrous prostitution, and sorcery. Of course, all of the above listed are related, though the modern examples don’t have to be evil, though they usually are. all of these have to do with the first 3 commandments on the two tablets. of course, someone could worship a symbol, also, and it wouldn’t matter if it were a star or a shield or a menorah, because even a God-made symbol (e.g. the menorah) shouldn’t be worshiped in and of itself, rather it should give glory to God, and maybe even cause or help others to worship and/or thank God. they’ve found idols with יהוה YHWH written on them, and today many people are deceived into thinking that YHWH was originally a pagan deity that the Israelites decided to take upon themselves. Well, anyone who reads the Bible knows that before Noah’s day the people started to use the name of YHWH. and look what happened to them. if the name of God itself can be written on an idol and be used by idolaters, then nothing in this world is holy. and that’s why they’re called evil and unholy and workers of evil. I apologize if this seems to be an angry message, it’s sometimes hard to distinguish which tone someone is typing in. This is just a rebuke, one that I would be glad to receive from any of you when I make a mistake by the way. Because first we’re to love our neighbors as ourselves, and then we can rebuke them, because none of us want to err and be foolish, but to be wise and holy =). on an interesting note, here are some cool things about the star/shield of david (this is personal interpretation and things i’ve picked up, i’m not how much of this is gone over in tradition or anything), the 6 days of the week are on the outside and the inside is the Shabbath. the area of the 6 triangles equals the area of the hexagon in the middle. you can fold the triangles over and it will match up with the hexagon, when you open it up it is the budding of the crown of a pomegranate, one of שבעת המינים the seven species reported by the spies about the fruit of the holy land, consider to be holy fruits/grains by jewish tradition. it could have been a design for a stronger than normal shield. it is drawn by two triangles, some say that one triangle represents God reaching down from heaven and man reaching up from earth. other say that this is male and female and a pagan symbol… wahtever n00b. the symbol also parallels with the menorah, which has 7 lamps, though essentially the 6 branch off from the center one. the lamps were lit in the temple according to the day of the week, and only on Shabbath were they all lit together. from prophecy and the gospel the lights of the menorah are on a few occasions called the eyes or spirits of God (zechariah 3 is one example, i’m having trouble finding where the 7 spirits are named). in one place it says there are 6, though the pure spirit of God is the 7th. in this way the central lamp of the menorah, or the center of the star of david would be the spirit of God, and the 6 things on the outside would represent the physical manifestation- also in new testament, compare to the seven gifts of the holy spirit, the middle one of course is the fear of the lord- wisdom, understanding, counsel, fortitude, knowledge, piety, and fear of the Lord. fellow believers and non-believers in Yeshua, blessings.
      House of Israel trust in YHWH
      House of Aharon trust in YHWH
      God-fearers trust in YHWH

  2. here we go again…..:>

  3. Thank you
    It reminds me of the story of the prodigal son in the new Testament. “For this my son was dead and is alive again; he was lost, and is found. and they began to celebrate.” Luke 15:24
    Let us Christians be overjoyed when Israel returns, and sees Jesus as their messiah.

  4. Most who are satanic and those who practice the evil arts or crafts against the Most High, utilize a 5-pointed star with a circle in the middle and it is called a Pentagram.

    If you are saying that God children are pagans?

    From the beginning of time when the Devil decided he wanted not to be like God but to be him, there has been lies and lack of truth along with copies of the truth. Should we God children and his chosen answer for every satanic or pagan thing? I say if you ask because you are confused? Then Yes. If you ask to create trouble? I say No.

    Since you got the part wrong about an emblem or symbolic means of identifying a group as Zionist please continue to read the rest of this email that you may gain a better understanding.

    Often Young and immature Christian excited to speak about God misspeak and mean no harm. I am sure this is the case with you, because who would speak about Gods’ children and not live in fear of the words spoken? So if the Devil says Gods children are wicked and evil does it make it so? Of course not.

    Pray for wisdom and understanding of the word and a desire to understand the Rhema and Logos words to reason and understand the things God has told us in the word. God loves for his children to seek and to find and he give liberally wisdom to he who ask.

    The Jews the long line of them, the apple of Abbas’ eye is the reason we live.

    Because of a Jew we have Christianity! His life was given in exchange for all mankind’s salvation. Why because God loves all of mankind. The Jews were given the responsibility to take the government of this world upon their shoulders, to do their best to bring light to dark places.

    Your words say you are preparing for PESACH)the Passover. But with your statements, I say you are not Jew. No Jewish person would ever speak evil of David who the star is about, nor would they speak evil of Solomon who was his son. You realize he was found worthy by God to build the temple, when his Father could not because he shed too much blood in wars.

    Do you therefore reason the word to say that God himself would not care if a Pagan built him a temple but wouldn’t allow the one who shed blood and was his beloved son of David who danced before the Lord.

    The symbol only started being used around the 1700s’ but the symbol is from the actual shield that David used in battle.

    God who created the heavens and the earth, chooses them as his very. Have enough since to know God takes the life of those who choose to think they are able to speak for him and then injure with wicked words those who he loves.

    This symbol became popular as the star was placed on the outside of temples to show that the worship of the Jews was practiced there. It became the Zionist movement emblem about 1897.

    When and if you ever don’t know what is true, compare the word with the word of God.

    There is no place in the Bible where any Jew is told not to use this symbol, but I will tell you this according to the word in the only book that counts; the Old and New Testament. It says that even the devil believes. They were told not to put the poles of the pagan things in the temple or by his altar.

    Paul said in Acts 17:30-31 the following: The times of ignorance God overlooked, but now he commands all people everywhere to repent, (31) because he had fixed a day on which he will judge the world in righteousness by a man whom he has appointed; and of this he has given assurance to all by raising him from the dead.”

    They can say that the words of our God says he is coming back to earth again to redeem his children and his apple of his eye will be forgiven for all of their sins. You must remember God took them into the faith they have still to this day as religion. It isn’t as faith done away with even for the Christian, it was Just ushered into to truly bring the full filling of Gods word. Jesus

    Here is some information that I think will help your understanding about “Abbas Apple:

    The following represents books of Jewish Philosophy and Religious Text and list isn’t all

    Torah or Haggadah or Kaddish or Principles of Faith or Eethics or Chosenness of Faith or Humash or Siddur or Talmud or Midrash or Tosefta or Kabbalah

    To give you a brief understanding of the study of Kabbalah:
    It is a set of teachings meant to explain the relationship between an eternal and mysterious Creator, God who is the creator of the mortal and the finite universe (his creation). While it is used by some denominations, there are many Christian denominations who confuse it with “Quabbalahor or Quabala” which is demonic/satanic.

    The Kabbalah it is a set of Jewish teachings utilized to describe nature and universe and human beings, the nature and purpose of existence, and various other ontological questions are further answered in the works. It presents methods to aid understanding of these concepts and to thereby attain spiritual realization. Kabbalah originally developed
    Entirely within the realm of Jewish thought and constantly uses classical Jewish sources
    To explain and demonstrate its esoteric teachings. These teachings are thus held by kabbalists to define the inner meaning of botth the Tanakh (Hebrew Bible) and traditional rabbinic literatures. They have been formerly concealed, they explain the significance of the Jewish religious observances.

    Important Jewish figures: Abraham, Isaac, Jacob, Moses, Aaron, David, Solomon, Sarah, Rebecca, Rachel, Leah, and the Rabbinic Sages

    Hope this helps your understanding.

    • hello. I was just visiting for a bit. and at the end of O abba father, where you mentioned Israel. Today, the Country of Israel is not Gods Chosen people. I have alot of information on who is the True Israel , I am going by memory ok? but I will leave some links. After God had Israel taken into captivity to the Assyrians for Idolatry in I believe it was 722 bc . And then Judah went into captivity to Babylon about 150 later. the 12 tribes: Rueben,Simeon, Levi, Judah, Dan, Naphtali,Gad, Issachar, Zebulun,Joseph, and Benjimin. The House of Judah: Judah, Benjimin, The House of Israel: Rueben, Simeon, Dan, Naphtali, Gad, Issachar, Zebulun, Joseph. There are 2 houses today. There is prophecy that God will make them one House again, but that comes much later. The House of Judah are the True Jews. And the House of Israel is the Christian Western Nations that settled in Europe, Americas, and Canada. There are many, many people that arent aware of this. err.. hmm Pattie Farm? I am going to have to tell you that Jesus never was a Jew. Never. In fact, the word Jew wasnt even in use during the time Yahshua was here. Kabbalah is satanism. What is your Holy Book, Patti? the Babylonian Talmud? I certainly pray that you will educate yourself with the Truth . This man that wrote ” the truth about Khazers, was one, but He came to His senses and converted to Christianity. I will post an article written by a Jewish Man——–> ‘FACTS ARE FACTS’ THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS (the so-called Jews) Distinguishing between the “Jew”, and Hebrews who are Israelites. By Benjamin H. Freedman: ‘A Jewish man writes about the Jews’ ‘FACTS ARE FACTS’ The historic facts revealed here for the first time provide incontestable evidence that their continued suppression will prove inimical to the security of the nation, the peace of the world, the welfare of humanity, and the progress of civilization. A facsimile reproduction reprinted and typeset to meet the many requests for a copy of the letter addressed to: DR. DAVID GOLDSTEIN, LL.D., of Boston, Mass. by its author BENJAMIN H. FREEDMAN of New York City Dated October 10, 1954 Former Zionist operative and Jewish defector Benjamin Freedman is shown here with a 1960 edition of the newspaper that was the primary venue for his writings after WWII, Common Sense. DEDICATION: to all men of good will of all racial origins and of all religious faiths Knowledge is a collection of facts. Wisdom is the use of knowledge. Without facts there is no knowledge. Without knowledge there is no wisdom. Facts prevent what nothing can cure. Facts are Man’s best defense mechanism. Without them men fumble, falter and fail. Without them nations decline and fall. Wisdom wins wars before they start. Knowledge aborts national hostilities. Wisdom obviates racial antipathies. Knowledge effaces religious animosities. Emancipation from bigotry prefaces peace. Intolerance takes all and gives nothing. Peace rewards reciprocal respect and regard. To all Men of Good Will, “Pax Vobiscum!” – Benjamin H. Freedman THE TRUTH ABOUT KHAZARS 960 Park Ave. New York City October Tenth, 1954. SPECIAL DELIVERY Dr. David Goldstein LL.D., Astor Post Office Station, Boston, Massachusetts. My Dear Dr. Goldstein, Your very outstanding achievements as a convert to Catholicism impress me as without a comparable parallel in modern history. Your devotion to the doctrine and the dogmas of the Roman Catholic Church defy any attempt at description by me only with words. Words fail me for that. As a vigorous protagonist preserving so persistently in propagating the principles of the Roman Catholic Church, -its purposes, its policies, its programs,- your dauntless determination is the inspiration for countless others who courageously seek to follow in your footsteps. In view of this fact it requires great courage for me to write to you as I am about to do. So I pray you receive this communication from me you will try to keep in mind Galatians 4:16 “Am I therefor become you enemy, because I tell you the truth?” I hope you will so favor me. It is truly a source of great pleasure and genuine gratification to greet you at long last although of necessity by correspondence. It is quite a disappointment for me to make your acquaintance in this manner. It would now afford me a far greater pleasure and a great privilege also if instead I could greet you on this occasion in person. Our very good mutual friend has for long been planning a meeting with you in person for me. I still wish to do that. I look forward with pleasant anticipation to doing this in the not too distant future at a time agreeable with you. You will discover in the contents of this long letter valid evidence for the urgency on my part to communicate with you without further delay. You will further discover this urgency reflected in the present gravity of the crisis which now jeopardizes an uninterrupted continuance of the Christian faith in its long struggle as the world’s most effective spiritual and social force in the Divine mission of promoting the welfare of all mankind without regard for their diversified races, religions, and nationalities. Your most recent article coming to my attention appeared in the September issue of ‘The A.P.J. Bulletin’, the official publication of the organization calling themselves The Archconfraternity of Prayer for Peace and Goodwill to Israel. The headline of your article, ‘News and Views of Jews’, and the purpose of the organization stated in the masthead of the publication, “To Promote Interest in the Apostalate to Israel” prompts me to take Father Time by his forelock and promptly offer my comments. I beg your indulgence accordingly. It is with reluctance that I place my comments in letter form. I hesitate to do so but I find it the only expedient thing to do under the circumstances. I beg to submit them to you now without reservations of any nature for your immediate and earnest consideration. It is my very sincere wish that you accept them in the friendly spirit in which they are submitted. It is also my hope that you will give your consideration to them and favor me with your early reply in the same friendly spirit for which I thank you in advance. In the best interests of that worthy objective to which you are continuing to dedicate the years ahead as you have so diligently done for many past decades, I most respectfully and sincerely urge you to analyze and to study carefully the data submitted to you here. I suggest also that you then take whatever steps you consider appropriate and necessary as a result of your conclusions. In the invisible and intangible ideological war being waged in defense of the great Christian heritage against its dedicated enemies your positive attitude is vital to victory. Your passive attitude will make a negative contribution to the total effort. You assuredly subscribe fully to that sound and sensible sentiment that “it is better to light one candle than to sit in darkness.” My solitary attempts to date “to give light to them that sit in darkness, and in the shadow” may prove no more successful with you now than they have in so many other instances where I have failed during the past thirty years. In your case I feel rather optimistic at the moment. Although not completely in vain I still live in the hope that one day on of these “candles” will burst into flame like a long smoldering spark and start a conflagration that will sweep across the nation like a prairie fire and illuminate vast new horizons for the first time. That unyielding hope is the source of the courage which aids me in my struggle against the great odds to which I am subjected for obvious reasons. It has been correctly contended for thousands of years that “In the end Truth always prevails.” We all realize that Truth in action can prove itself a dynamic power of unlimited force. But alas Truth has no self-starter. Truth cannot get off dead-center unless a worthy apostle gives Truth a little push to overcome its inertia. Without that start Truth will stand still and will never arrive at its intended destination. Truth has often died aborning for that most logical reason. Your help in this respect will prove of great value. On the other hand Truth has many times been completely “blacked out” by repeating contradictory and conflicting untruths over and over again, and again, and again. The world’s recent history supplies sober testimony of the dangers to civilization inherent in that technique. That form of treason to Truth is treachery to mankind. You must be very careful, my dear Dr. Goldstein, not to become unwittingly one of the many accessories before and after the fact who have appeared upon the scene of public affairs in recent years. Whether unwittingly, unwillingly or unintentionally many of history’s most noted characters have misrepresented the truth to the world and they have been so believed that it puzzles our generation. As recently as 1492 the world was misrepresented as flat by all the best alleged authorities on the subject. In 1492 Christopher Columbus was able to demonstrate otherwise. There are countless similar instances in the history of the world. Whether these alleged authorities were guilty of ignorance or indifference is here beside the point. It is not important now. They were either totally ignorant of the facts or they knew the facts but chose to remain silent on the subject for reasons undisclosed by history. A duplication of this situation exists today with respect to the crisis which confronts the Christian faith. It is a vital factor today in the struggle for survival or the eventual surrender of the Christian faith to its enemies. The times in which we are living appear to be the “zero hour” for the Christian faith. As you have observed, no institution in our modern society can long survive if its structure is not from its start erected upon a foundation of Truth. The Christian faith was first erected upon a very solid foundation of Truth by its Founder. To survive it must remain so. The deterioration, the disintegration, and finally the destruction of the structure of the Christian faith today will be accelerated in direct ratio to the extent that misrepresentation and distortion of Truth become the substitutes of Truth. Truth is an absolute quality. Truth can never be relative. There can be no degrees to Truth. Truth either exists or it does not exist. To be half-true is as incredible as to be half-honest or to be half-loyal. As you have undoubtedly also learned, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in their attempt to do an “ounce” of good in one direction many well-intentioned persons do a “ton” of harm in another direction. We all learn that lesson sooner or later in life. Today finds you dedicating your unceasing efforts and your untiring energy to the task of bringing so-called or self-styled “Jews” into the Roman Catholic Church as converts. It must recall to you many times the day so many years ago when you embraced Catholicism yourself as a convert. More power to you, and the best of luck. May your efforts be rewarded with great success. Without you becoming aware of the fact, the methods you employ contribute in no small degree to dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. For each “ounce” of so- called good you accomplish by conversion of so-called or self- styled “Jews” to the Christian faith at the same time you do a “ton” of harm in another direction by diluting the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. This bold conclusion on my part is asserted by me with the firm and fair conviction that the facts will support my contention. In addition it is a well-known fact that many “counterfeit” recent conversions reveal that conversions have often proved to be but “infiltrations” by latent traitors with treasonable intentions. The attitudes you express today and your continued activity in this work require possible revision in the light of the facts submitted to you in this letter. Your present philosophy and theology on this subject seriously merit, without any delay, reconsideration on your part. What you say or write may greatly influence a “boom” or a “bust” for the Christian faith in the very near future far beyond your ability to accurately evaluate sitting in your high “white ivory tower.” The Christians implicitly believe whatever you write. So do the so-called or self-styled “Jews” whom you seek to convert. This influence you wield can become a danger. I must call it to your attention. Your reaction to the facts called to your attention in this letter can prove to be one of the most crucial verdicts ever reached bearing upon the security of the Christian faith in recent centuries. In keeping with this great responsibility I sincerely commend this sentiment to you hoping that you will earnestly study the contents of this letter from its first word to its very last word. All who know you will are in the fortunate position to know how close this subject is to your heart. By your loyalty to the high ideals you have observed during the many years you have labored so valiantly on behalf of the Christian faith you have earned the admiration you enjoy. The Christian faith you chose of your own free will in the prime of life is very proud of you in more ways than as a convert. Regardless of what anyone anywhere and anytime in this whole wide world may say to the contrary, events of recent years everywhere establish beyond any question of a doubt that the Christian faith today stands with one foot in the grave and the other on a banana peel figuratively speaking of course. Only those think otherwise who deliberately shut their eyes to realities or who do not chose to see even with their eyes wide open. I believe you to be too realistic to indulge yourself in the futile folly of fooling yourself. It is clear that the Christian faith today stands at the cross- roads of its destiny. The Divine and sacred mission of the Christian faith is in jeopardy today to a degree never witnessed before in its long history of almost 2000 years. The Christian faith needs loyal friends now as never before. I somehow feel that you can always be counted upon as one of its loyal friends. You cannot over-simplify the present predicament of the Christian faith. The problem it faces is too self-evident to mistake. It is in a critical situation. When the day arrives that Christians can no longer profess their Christian faith as they profess it today in the free world the Christian faith will have seen the beginning of its “last days.” What already applies to 50% of the world’s total population can shortly apply equally to 100% of the world’s total population. It is highly conceivable judging from present trends. The malignant character of this malady is just as progressive as cancer. It will surely prove as fatal also unless steps are taken now to reverse its course. What is now being done toward arresting its progress or reversing its trend? My dear Dr. Goldstein, can you recall the name of the philosopher who is quoted as saying that “Nothing in this world is permanent except change?” That philosophy must be applied to the Christian faith also. The $64 question remains whether the change will be for the better or for the worse. The problem is that simple. If the present trend continues for another 37 years in the same direction and at the same rate traveled for the past 37 years the Christian faith as it is professed today by Christians will have disappeared from the face of the earth. In what form or by what instrumentality the mission of Jesus Christ will thereupon and thereafter continue to make itself manifest here on earth is as unpredictable as it is inevitable. In the existing crisis it is neither logical nor realistic to drive Christians out of the Christian “fold” in relatively large numbers for the dubious advantage to be obtained by bringing a comparatively small number of so-called or self-styled “Jews” into the Christian “fold”. It is useless to try to deny the fact that today finds the Christian faith on the defense throughout the world. This realization staggers the imagination of the few Christians who understand the situation. This status of the Christian faith exists in spite of the magnificent contributions of the Christian faith to the progress of humanity and civilization for almost 2000 years. It is not my intention in this letter to expose the conspirators who are dedicating themselves to the destruction of the Christian faith nor to the nature and extent of the conspiracy itself. That exposure would fill many volumes. The history of the world for the past several centuries and current events at home and abroad confirm the existence of such a conspiracy. The world-wide network of diabolical conspirators implement this plot against the Christian faith while Christians appear to be sound asleep. The Christian clergy appear to be more ignorant or more indifferent about this conspiracy than other Christians. They seem to bury their heads in the sands of ignorance or indifference like the legendary ostrich. This ignorance or indifference on the part of the Christian clergy has dealt a blow to the Christian faith already from which it may never completely recover, if at all. It seems so sad. Christians deserve to be blessed in this crisis with a spiritual Paul Revere to ride across the nation warning Christians that their enemies are moving in on them fast. My dear Dr. Goldstein, will you volunteer to be that Paul Revere? Of equal importance to pin-pointing the enemies who are making war upon the Christian faith from the outside is the necessity to discover the forces at work inside the Christian faith which make it so vulnerable to its enemies on the outside. Applying yourself to this specific phase of the problem can prove of tremendous value in rendering ineffective the forces responsible for this dangerous state of affairs. The souls of millions of Christians who are totally unknown to you are quite uneasy about the status of the Christian faith today. The minds of countless thousands among the Christian clergy are troubled by the mysterious “pressure” from above which prevents them exercising their sound judgment in this situation. If the forces being manipulated against the Christian faith from the inside can be stopped the Christian faith will be able to stand upon its feet against its enemies as the Rock of Gibraltar. Unless this can be done soon the Christian faith appears destined to crumble and to eventually collapse. An ounce of prevention is far preferable to a pound of cure you can be sure in this situation as in all others. With all the respect due to the Christian clergy and in all humility I have an unpleasant duty to perform. I wish to go on record with you here that the Christian clergy are primarily if not solely responsible for the internal forces within the Christian faith inimical to its best interests. This conclusion on my part indicates the sum total of all the facts in my book which add up to just that. If you truly desire to be realistic and constructive you must “hew to the line and let the chips fall where they may.” That is the only strategy that can save the Christian faith from a fate it does not deserve. You cannot pussy-foot with the truth any longer simply because you find that now “the truth hurts”, -someone you know or like. At this late hour very little time is left in which to mend our fences if I can call it that. We are not in a position to waste any of our limited time. “Beating it around the bush” now will get us exactly nowhere. The courageous alone will endure the present crisis when all the chips are down. Figuratively and possibly literally there will be live heroes and dead cowards when the dust of this secular combat settles and not dead heroes and live cowards as sometimes occurs under other circumstances. The Christian faith today remains the only “anchor to windward” against universal barbarism. The dedicated enemies of the Christian faith have sufficiently convinced the world by this time of the savage methods they will adopt in their program to erase the Christian faith from the face of the earth. Earlier in this letter I stated that in my humble opinion the apathy of the Christian clergy might be charged with sole responsibility for the increasing dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for the Christian faith. This is the natural consequence of the confusion created by the Christian clergy in the minds of Christians concerning certain fundamentals of the Christian faith. The guilt for this confusion rests exclusively upon Christian leadership not upon Christians generally. Confusion creates doubt. Doubt creates loss of confidence. Loss of confidence creates loss of interest. As confusion grows more, and more, and more confidence grows less, and less, and less. The result is complete loss of all interest. You can hardly disagree with that, my dear Dr. Goldstein, can you? The confusion in the minds of Christians concerning fundamentals of the Christian faith is unwarranted and unjustified. It need not exist. It would not exist if the Christian clergy did not aid and abet the deceptions responsible for it. The Christian clergy may be shocked to learn that they have been aiding and abetting the dedicated enemies of the Christian faith. Many of the Christian clergy are actually their allies but may not know it. This phase of the current world-wide campaign of spiritual sabotage is the most negative factor in the defense of the Christian faith. Countless Christians standing on the sidelines in this struggle see their Christian faith “withering on the vine” and about ripe enough to “drop into the lap” of its dedicated enemies. They can do nothing about it. Their cup is made more bitter for them as they observe this unwarranted and this unjustified ignorance and indifference on the part of the Christian clergy. This apathetic attitude by the Christian clergy offers no opposition to the aggressors against the Christian faith. Retreat can only bring defeat. To obviate surrender to their dedicated enemies the Christian clergy must “about face” immediately if they expect to become the victors in the invisible and intangible ideological war now being so subversively waged against the Christian faith under their very noses. When will they wake up? If I were asked to recite in this letter the many manners in which the Christian clergy are confusing the Christian concept of the fundamentals of the Christian faith it would require volumes rather than pages to tell the whole story. Space alone compels me here to confine myself to the irreducible minimum. I will limit myself here to the most important reasons for this confusion. Brevity will of necessity limit the references cited to support the matters presented in this letter. I will do my best under the circumstances to establish the authenticity of the incontestable historical facts I call to your attention here. In my opinion the most important reason is directly related to your present activities. Your responsibility for this confusion is not lessened by your good intentions. As you have heard said so many times “Hell is paved with good intentions.” The confusion your articles create is multiplied a thousand-fold by the wide publicity given to them as a result of the very high regard in which you personally are held by editors and readers across the nation, Christian and non-Christian alike. Your articles constantly are continually reprinted and quoted from coast to coast. The utterance by the Christian clergy which confuses Christians the most is the constantly repeated utterance that “Jesus was a Jew.” That also appears to be your favorite theme. That misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact is uttered by the Christian clergy upon the slightest pretext. They utter it constantly, also without provocation. They appear to be “trigger happy” to utter it. They never miss an opportunity to do so. Informed intelligent Christians cannot reconcile this truly unwarranted misrepresentation and distortion of an incontestable historic fact by the Christian clergy with information known by them now to the contrary which comes to them from sources believed by them to be equally reliable. This poses a serious problem today for the Christian clergy. They can extricate themselves from their present predicament now only be resorting to “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. That is the only formula by which the Christian clergy can recapture the lost confidence of Christians. As effective spiritual leaders they cannot function without this lost confidence. They should make that their first order of business. My dear Dr. Goldstein, you are a theologian of high rank and a historian of note. Of necessity you also should agree with other outstanding authorities on the subject of whether “Jesus was a Jew.” These leading authorities agree today that there is no foundation in fact for the implications, inferences and the innuendoes resulting from the incorrect belief that “Jesus was a Jew”. Incontestable historic facts and an abundance of other proofs establish beyond the possibility of any doubt the incredibility of the assertion so often heard today that “Jesus was a Jew”. Without any fear of contradiction based upon fact the most competent and best qualified authorities all agree today that Jesus Christ was not a so-called or self-styled “Jew”. They do confirm that during His lifetime Jesus was known as a “Judean” by His contemporaries and not as a “Jew”, and that Jesus referred to Himself as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”. During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was referred to by contemporary historians as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew.” Contemporary theologians of Jesus whose competence to pass upon this subject cannot challenge by anyone today also referred to Jesus during his lifetime here on earth as a “Judean” and not as a “Jew”. Inscribed upon the Cross when Jesus was Crucified were the Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. Pontius Pilate’s mother-tongue. No one will question the fact that Pontius Pilate was well able to accurately express his own ideas in his own mother-tongue. The authorities competent to pass upon the correct translation into English of the Latin “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum” agree that it is “Jesus of Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans.” There is no disagreement upon that by them. During His lifetime here on earth Jesus was not regarded by Pontius Pilate nor by the Judeans among whom He dwelt as “King of the Jews”. The inscription on the Cross upon which Jesus was Crucified has been incorrectly translated into the English language only since the 18th century. Pontius Pilate was ironic and sarcastic when he ordered inscribed upon the Cross the Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. About to be Crucified, with the approval of Pontius Pilate, Jesus was being mocked by Pontius Pilate. Pontius Pilate was well aware at that time that Jesus had been denounced, defied and denied by the Judeans who alas finally brought about His Crucifixion as related by history. Except for His few followers at that time in Judea all other Judeans abhorred Jesus and detested His teachings and the things for which He stood. That deplorable fact cannot be erased from history by time. Pontius Pilate was himself the “ruler” of the Judeans at the time he ordered inscribed upon the Cross in Latin words “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”, In English “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans”. But Pontius Pilate never referred to himself as “ruler” of the Judeans. The ironic and sarcastic reference of Pontius Pilate to Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans” can hardly be accepted as recognition by Pontius Pilate of Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans”. That is inconceivable by any interpretation. At the time of the Crucifixion of Jesus Pontius Pilate was the administrator in Judea for the Roman Empire. At that time in history the area of the Roman Empire included a part of the Middle East. As far as he was concerned officially or personally the inhabitants of Judea were “Judeans” to Pontius Pilate and not so- called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate and not so-called “Jews” as they have been styled since the 18th century. In the time of Pontius Pilate in history there was no religious, racial or national group in Judea known as “Jews” nor had there been any group so identified anywhere else in the world prior to that time. Pontius Pilate expressed little interest as the administrator of the Roman Empire officially or personally in the wide variety of forms of religious worship then practiced in Judea. These forms of religious worship extended from phallic worship and other forms of idolatry to the emerging spiritual philosophy of an eternal, omnipotent and invisible Divine deity, the emerging Yahve (Jehovah) concept which predated Abraham of Bible fame by approximately 2000 years. As the administrator for the Roman Empire in Judea it was the official policy of Pontius Pilate never to interfere in the spiritual affairs of the local population. Pontius Pilate’s primary responsibility was the collection of taxes to be forwarded home to Rome, not the forms of religious worship practiced by the Judeans from whom those taxes were collected. As you well know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the Latin word “rex” means “ruler, leader” in English. During the lifetime of Jesus in Judea the Latin word “rex” meant only that to Judeans familiar with the Latin language. The Latin word “rex” is the Latin verb “rego, regere, rexi, rectus” in English means as you also well know “to rule, to lead”. Latin was of course the official language in all the provinces administered by a local administrator of the Roman Empire. This fact accounts for the inscription on the Cross in Latin. With the invasion of the British Isles by the Anglo-Saxons, the English language substituted the Anglo-Saxon “king” for the Latin equivalent “rex” used before the Anglo-Saxon invasion. The adoption of “king” for “rex” at this late date in British history did not retroactively alter the meaning of the Latin “rex” to the Judeans in the time of Jesus. The Latin “rex” to them then meant only “ruler, leader” as it still means in Latin. Anglo-Saxon “king” was spelled differently when first used but at all times meant the same as “rex” in Latin, “leader” of a tribe. During the lifetime of Jesus it was very apparent to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was the very last Person in Judea the Judeans would select as their “ruler” or their “leader”. In spite of this situation in Judea Pontius Pilate did not hesitate to order the inscription of the Cross “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudeorum”. By the wildest stretch of the imagination it is not conceivable that this sarcasm and irony by Pontius Pilate at the time of the Crucifixion was not solely mockery of Jesus by Pontius Pilate and only mockery. After this reference to “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans” the Judeans forthwith proceeded to Crucify Jesus upon that very Cross. In Latin in the lifetime of Jesus the name of the political subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was “Iudaea”. It was then administered by Pontius Pilate as administrator for the Roman Empire of which it was then a part. The English for the Latin “Iudaea” is “Judea”. English “Judean” is the adjective for the noun “Judea”. The ancient native population of the subdivision in the Middle East known in modern history as Palestine was then called “Iudaeus” in Latin and “Judean” in English. Those words identified the indigenous population of Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. Who can deny that Jesus was a member of the indigenous population of Judea in His lifetime? And of course you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, in Latin the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” is “Iudaeorum”. The English translation of the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeorum” is “of the Judeans”. It is utterly impossible to give any other English translation to “Iudaeorum” than “of the Judeans”. Qualified and competent theologians and historians regard as incredible any other translation into English of “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum” than “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans”. You must agree that this is literally correct. At the time Pontius Pilate was ordering the “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum” inscribed upon the Cross the spiritual leaders of Judea were protesting to Pontius Pilate “not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans” but to inscribe instead that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”. The spiritual leaders of Judea made very strong protests to Pontius Pilate against his reference to Jesus as “Rex Iudaeorum” insisting that Pontius Pilate was not familiar with or misunderstood the status of Jesus in Judea. These protests are a matter of historical record, as you know. The spiritual leaders in Judea protested in vain with Pontius Pilate. They insisted that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans” but that Pontius Pilate was “not to write that Jesus was the ruler of the Judeans”. For after all Pontius Pilate was a foreigner in Judea who could not understand the local situations as well as the spiritual leaders. The intricate pattern of the domestic political, social and economic cross-currents in Judea interested Pontius Pilate very little as Rome’s administrator. The Gospel by John was written originally in the Greek language according to the best authorities. In the Greek original there is no equivalent for the English that Jesus “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”. The English translation of the Greek original of the Gospel by John, XIX, 19, reads “Do not inscribe ‘the monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios), but that He Himself said I am monarch (basileus) of the Judeans (Ioudaios)’ “. “Ioudaia” is the Greek for the Latin for “basileus” in Greek. The English “ruler”, or its alternative “leader”, define the sense of Latin “rex” and Greek “basileus” as they were used in the Greek and Latin Gospel of John. Pontius Pilate “washed his hands” of the protests by the spiritual leaders in Judea who demanded of him that the inscription on the Cross authored by Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate be corrected in the manner they insisted upon. Pontius Pilate very impatiently replied to their demands “What I have written, I have written.” The inscription on the Cross remained what it had been, “Iesus Nazarenus Rex Iudaeorum”, or “Jesus the Nazarene Ruler of the Judeans” in English. The Latin quotations and words mentioned in this letter are verbatim quotations and the exact words which appear in the 4th century translation of the New Testament into Latin by St. Jerome. This translation is referred to as the Vulgate Edition of the New Testament. It was the first official translation of the New Testament into Latin made by the Christian Church. Since that time it has remained the official New Testament version used by the Catholic Church. The translation of the Gospel of John into Latin by St. Jerome was made from the Greek language in which the Gospel of John was originally written according to the best authorities on this subject. The English translation of the gospel by John XIX, 19, from the original text in the Greek language reads as follows, “Pilate wrote a sign and fastened it to the Cross and the writing was “Jesus the Nazarene the monarch of the Judeans’ “. In the original Greek manuscript there is mention also made of the demands upon Pontius Pilate by the spiritual leaders in Judea that Pontius Pilate alter the reference on the Cross to Jesus as “Ruler of the Judeans”. The Greek text of the original manuscript of the Gospel by John establishes beyond any question or doubt that the spiritual leaders in Judea at that time had protested to Pontius Pilate that Jesus was “not the ruler of the Judeans” but only “had said that He was the ruler of the Judeans”. There is no factual foundation in history or theology today for the implications, inferences and innuendoes that the Greek “Ioudaios”, the Latin “Iudaeus”, or the English “Judean:” ever possessed a valid religious connotation. In their three respective languages these three words have only indicated a strictly topographical or geographical connotation. In their correct sense these three words in their respective languages were used to identify the members of the indigenous native population of the geographic area known as Judea in the lifetime of Jesus. During the lifetime of Jesus there was not a form of religious worship practiced in Judea or elsewhere in the known world which bore a name even remotely resembling the name of the political subdivision of the Roman Empire; i.e., “Judaism” from “Judea”. No cult or sect existed by such a name. It is an incontestable fact that the word “Jew” did not come into existence until the year 1775. Prior to 1775 the word “Jew” did not exist in any language. The word “Jew” was introduced into the English for the first time in the 18th century when Sheridan used it in his play “The Rivals”, II,i, “She shall have a skin like a mummy, and the beard of a Jew”. Prior to this use of the word “Jew” in the English language by Sheridan in 1775 the word “Jew” had not become a word in the English language. Shakespeare never saw the word “Jew” as you will see. Shakespeare never used the word “Jew” in any of his works, the common general belief to the contrary notwithstanding. In his “Merchant of Venice”, V.III.i.61, Shakespeare wrote as follows: “what is the reason? I am a Iewe; hath not a Iewe eyes?”. In the Latin St. Jerome 4th century Vulgate Edition of the New Testament Jesus is referred to by the Genitive Plural of “Iudaeus” in the Gospel of John reference to the inscription on the Cross, – “Iudaeorum”. It was in the 4th century that St. Jerome translated into Latin the manuscripts of the New Testament from the original languages in which they were written. This translation by St. Jerome is referred to still today as the Vulgate Edition by the Roman Catholic Church authorities, who use it today. Jesus is referred as a so-called “Jew” for the first time in the New Testament in the 18th century. Jesus is first referred to as a so-called “Jew” in the revised 18th century editions in the English language of the 14th century first translations of the New Testament into English. The history of the origin of the word “Jew” in the English language leaves no doubt that the 18th century “Jew” is the 18th century contracted and corrupted English word for the 4th century Latin “Iudaeus” found in St. Jerome’s Vulgate Edition. Of that there is no longer doubt. The available manuscripts from the 4th century to the 18th century accurately trace the origin and give the complete history of the word “Jew” in the English language. In these manuscripts are to be found all the many earlier English equivalents extending through the 14 centuries from the 4th to the 18th century. From the Latin “Iudaeus” to the English “Jew” these English forms included successively: “Gyu”, “Giu”, “Iu”, “Iuu”, “Iuw”, “Ieuu”, “Ieuy”, “Iwe”, “Iow”, “Iewe”, “leue”, “Iue”, “Ive”, “lew”, and then finally in the 18th century, “Jew”. The many earlier English equivalents for “Jews” through the 14 centuries are “Giwis”, “Giws”, “Gyues”, “Gywes”, “Giwes”, “Geus”, “Iuys”, “Iows”, “Iouis”, “Iews”, and then also finally in the 18th century, “Jews”. With the rapidly expanding use in England in the 18th century for the first time in history of the greatly improved printing presses unlimited quantities of the New Testament were printed. These revised 18th century editions of the earlier 14th century first translations into the English language were then widely distributed throughout England and the English speaking world among families who had never possessed a copy of the New Testament in any language. In these 18th century editions with revisions the word “Jew” appeared for the first time in any English translations. The word “Jew” as it was used in the 18th century editions has since continued in use in all elections of the New Testament in the English language. The use of the word “Jew” thus was stabilized. As you know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, the best known 18th century editions of the New Testament in English are the Rheims (Douai) Edition and the King James Authorized Edition. The Rheims (Douai) translation of the New Testament into English was first printed in 1582 but the word “Jew” did not appear in it. The King James Authorized translation of the New Testament into English was begun in 1604 and first published in 1611. The word “Jew” did not appear in it either. The word “Jew” appeared in both these well known editions in their 18th century revised versions for the first times. Countless copies of the revised 18th century editions of the Rheims (Douai) and the King James translations of the New Testament into English were distributed to the clergy and the laity throughout the English speaking world. They did not know the history of the origin of the English word “Jew” nor did they care. They accepted the English word “Jew” as the only and as the accepted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. How could they be expected to have known otherwise? The answer is they could not and they did not. It was a new English word to them. When you studied Latin in your school days you were taught that the letter “I” in Latin when used as the first letter in a word is pronounced like the letter “Y” in English when it is the first letter in words like “yes”, “youth” and “yacht”. The “I” in “Iudaeus” is pronounced like the “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” in English. In all the 4th century to 18th century forms for the 18th century “Jew” the letter “I” was pronounced like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. The same is true of the “Gi” or the “Gy” where it was used in place of the letter “I”. The present pronunciation of the word “Jew” in modern English is a development of recent times. In the English language today the “J” in “Jew” is pronounced like the “J” in the English “justice”, “jolly”, and “jump”. This is the case only since the 18th century. Prior to the 18th century the “J” in “Jew” was pronounced exactly like the “Y” in the English “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. Until the 18th century and perhaps even later than the 18th century the word “Jew” in English was pronounced like the English “you” or “hew”, and the word “Jews” like “youse” or “hews”. The present pronunciation of “Jew” in English is a new pronunciation acquired after the 18th century. The German language still retains the Latin original pronunciation. The German “Jude” is the German equivalent of the English “Jew”. The “J” in the German “Jude” is pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht”. The German “J” is the equivalent of the Latin “I” and both are pronounced exactly like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth” and “yacht”. The German “Jude” is virtually the first syllable of the Latin “Iudaeus” and is pronounced exactly like it. The German “Jude” is the German contraction and corruption of the Latin “Iudaeus” just as the English “Jew” is the contraction and corruption of the Latin “Iudaeus”. The German “J” is always pronounced like the English “Y” in “yes”, “youth”, and “yacht” when it is the first letter of a word. The pronunciation of the “J” in German “Jude” is not an exception to the pronunciation of the “J” in German. The English language as you already know, my dear Dr. Goldstein, is largely made up of words adopted from foreign languages. After their adoption by the English language foreign words were then adapted by contracting their spelling and corrupting their foreign pronunciation to make them more easily pronounced in English from their English spelling. This process of first adopting foreign words and then adapting them by contracting their spelling and corrupting their pronunciation resulted in such new words in the English language as “cab” from the French “cabriolet” and many thousands of other words similarly from their original foreign spelling. Hundreds of others must come to your mind. By this adopting-adapting process the Latin “Iudacus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” finally emerged in the 18th century as “Jew” in the English language. The English speaking peoples struggled through 14 centuries seeking to create for the English language an English equivalent for the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” which could be easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The English “Jew” was the resulting 18th century contracted and corrupted form of the Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios”. The English “Jew” is easily pronounced in English from its English spelling. The Latin “Iudaeus” and the Greek “Ioudaios” cannot be as easily pronounced in English from the Latin and Greek spelling. They were forced to coin a word. The earliest version of the New Testament in English from the Latin Vulgate Edition is the Wyclif, or Wickliffe Edition published in 1380. In the Wyclif Edition Jesus is there mentioned as One of the “iewes”. That was the 14th century English version of the Latin “Iudaeus” and was pronounced “hew-weeze”, in the plural, and “iewe” pronounced “hew-wee” in the singular. In the 1380 Wyclif Edition in English the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads “Ihesus of nazareth kyng of the iewes”. Prior to the 14th century the English language adopted the Anglo-Saxon “kyng” together with many other Anglo-Saxon words in place of the Latin “rex” and the Greek “basileus”. The Anglo-Saxon also meant “tribal leader”. In the Tyndale Edition of the New Testament in English published in 1525 Jesus was likewise described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Coverdale Edition published in 1535 Jesus was also described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Coverdale Edition the Gospel by John, XIX.19, reads “Iesus the Nazareth, kynge of the “Iewes”. In the Cranmer Edition published in 1539 Jesus was again described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Geneva Edition published in 1540-1557 Jesus was also described as One of the “Iewes”. In the Rheims Edition published in 1582 Jesus was described as One of the “Ievves”. In the King James Edition published in 1604-1611 also known as the Authorized Version Jesus was described again as one of the “Iewes”. The forms of the Latin “Iudaeus” were used which were current at the time these translations were made. The translation into English of the Gospel by John, XIX.19, from the Greek in which it was originally written reads “Do not inscribe `the monarch of the Judeans’ but that He Himself said `I am monarch’ “. In the original Greek manuscript the Greek “basileus” appears for “monarch” in the English and the Greek “Ioudaios” appears for “Judeans” in the English. “Ioudaia” in Greek is “Judea” in English. “Ioudaios” in Greek is “Judeans” in English. There is no reason for any confusion. My dear Dr. Goldstein, if the generally accepted understanding today of the English “Jew” and “Judean” conveyed the identical implications, inferences and innuendoes as both rightly should, it would make no difference which of these two words was used when referring to Jesus in the New Testament or elsewhere. But the implications, inferences, and innuendoes today conveyed by these two words are as different as black is from white. The word “Jew” today is never regarded as a synonym for “Judean” nor is “Judean” regarded as a synonym for “Jew”. As I have explained, when the word “Jew” was first introduced into the English language in the 18th century its one and only implication, inference and innuendo was “Judean”. However during the 18th, 19th and 20th centuries a well-organized and well- financed international “pressure group” created a so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” among the English- speaking peoples of the world. This so-called “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” bears no relation whatsoever to the 18th century original connotation of the word “Jew”. It is a misrepresentation. The “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today bears as little relation to its original and correct meaning as the “secondary meaning” today as for the word “camel” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “camel”, or the “secondary meaning” for the word “ivory” bears to the original and correct meaning of the word “ivory”. The “secondary meaning” today for the word “camel” is a cigarette by that name but its original and correct meaning is a desert animal by that ancient name. The “secondary meaning” of the word “ivory” today is a piece of soap but its original and correct meaning is the tusk of a male elephant. The “secondary meaning” of words often become the generally accepted meanings of words formerly having entirely different meanings. This is accomplished by the expenditure of great amounts of money for well-planned publicity. Today if you ask for a “camel” someone will hand you a cigarette by that name. Today if you ask for a piece of “ivory” someone will hand you a piece of soap by that name. You will never receive either a desert animal or a piece of the tusk of a male elephant. That must illustrate the extent to which these “secondary meanings” are able to practically eclipse the original and correct meanings of words in the minds of the general public. The “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” today has practically totally eclipsed the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew” when it was introduced as a word in the English language. This phenomena is not uncommon. The United States Supreme Court has recognized the “secondary meaning” of words. The highest court in the land has established as basic law that “secondary meanings” can acquire priority rights to the use of any dictionary word. Well-planned and well-financed world-wide publicity through every available media by well-organized groups of so-called or self-styled “Jews” for three centuries has created a “secondary meaning” for the word “Jew” which has completely “blacked out” the original and correct meaning of the word “Jew”. There can be no doubt about that. There is not a person in the whole English-speaking world today who regards a “Jew” as a “Judean” in the literal sense of the word. That was the correct and only meaning in the 18th century. The generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” today with practically no exceptions is made up of four almost universally-believed theories. These four theories are that a so- called or self-styled “Jew” is (1) a person who today professes the form of religious worship known as “Judaism”, (2) a person who claims to belong to a racial group associated with the ancient Semites, (3) a person directly the descendant of an ancient nation which thrived in Palestine in Bible history, (4) a person blessed by Divine intentional design with certain superior cultural characteristics denied to other racial, religious or national groups, all rolled into one. The present generally accepted “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew” is fundamentally responsible for the confusion in the minds of Christians regarding elementary tenets of the Christian faith. It is likewise responsible today to a very great extent for the dilution of the devotion of countless Christians for their Christian faith. The implications, inferences and innuendoes of the word “Jew” today, to the preponderant majority of intelligent and informed Christians, is contradictory and in complete conflict with incontestable historic fact. Christians who cannot be fooled any longer are suspect of the Christian clergy who continue to repeat, and repeat, and repeat ad nauseam their pet theme song “Jesus was a Jew”. It actually now approaches a psychosis. Countless Christians know today that they were “brain washed” by the Christian clergy on the subject “Jesus was a Jew”. The resentment they feel is not yet apparent to the Christian clergy. Christians now are demanding from the Christian clergy, “the truth, the whole truth, and nothing but the truth”. It is now time for the Christian clergy to tell Christians what they should have told them long ago. Of all religious groups in the world Christians appear to be the least informed of any on the subject. Have their spiritual leaders been reckless with the truth? Countless intelligent and informed Christians no longer accept unchallenged assertions by the Christian clergy that Jesus in His lifetime was a Member of a group in Judea which practiced a religious form of worship then which is today called “Judaism”, or that Jesus in His lifetime here on earth was a Member of the racial group which today includes the preponderant majority of all so- called or self-styled “Jews” in the world, or that the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the lineal descendants of the nation in Judea of which Jesus was a national in His lifetime here on earth, or that the cultural characteristics of so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today correspond with the cultural characteristics of Jesus during His lifetime here on earth and His teachings while He was here on earth for a brief stay. Christians will no longer believe that the race, religion, nationality and culture of Jesus and the race, religion, nationality and culture of so-called or self-styled “Jews” today or their ancestors have a common origin or character. The resentment by Christians is more ominous than the Christian clergy suspect. Under existing conditions the Christian clergy will find that ignorance is not bliss, nor wisdom folly. Christians everywhere today are seeking to learn the authentic relationship between the so-called or self-styled “Jews” through-out the world today and the “Judeans” who populated “Judea” before, during and after the time of Jesus. Christians now insist that they be told correctly by the Christian clergy about the racial, religious, national and cultural background of the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today and the basis for associating these backgrounds with the racial, religious, national and cultural background of Jesus in His lifetime in Judea. The intelligent and informed Christian are alerted to the exploded myth that the so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today are the direct descendants of the “Judeans” amongst whom Jesus lived during His lifetime here on earth. Christians today are also becoming more and more alerted day by day why the so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world for three centuries have spent uncounted sums of money to manufacture the fiction that the “Judeans” in the time of Jesus were “Jews” rather than “Judeans”, and that “Jesus was a Jew”. Christians are becoming more and more aware day by day of all the economic and political advantages accruing to the so-called or self- styled “Jews” as a direct result of their success in making Christians believe that “Jesus was a Jew” in the “secondary meaning” they have created for the 18th century word “Jew”. The so-called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world today represent themselves to Christians as “Jews” only in the “secondary meaning” of the word “Jew”. They seek to thereby prove their kinship with Jesus. They emphasize this fiction to Christians constantly. That fable is fast fading and losing its former grip upon the imaginations of Christians. To allege that “Jesus was a Jew” in the sense that during His lifetime Jesus professed and practiced the form of religious worship known and practiced under the modern name of “Judaism” is false and fiction of the most blasphemous nature. If to be a so- called or self-styled “Jew” then or now the practice of “Judaism” was a requirement then Jesus certainly was not a so-called “Jew”. Jesus abhorred and denounced the form of religious worship practiced in Judea in His lifetime and which is known and practiced today under its new name “Judaism”. That religious belief was then known as “Pharisiasm”. The Christian clergy learned that in their theological seminary days but they have never made any attempt to make that clear to Christians. The eminent Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, the head of The Jewish Theological Seminary of America, often referred to as “The Vatican of Judaism”, in his Foreword to his First Edition of his world-famous classic “The Pharisees, The Sociological Background of Their Faith”, on page XXI states: “…Judaism…Pharisiasm became Talmudism, Talmudism became Medieval Rabbinism, and Medieval Rabbinism became Modern Rabbinism. But throughout these changes in name…the spirit of the ancient Pharisees survives, unaltered…From Palestine to Babylonia; from Babylonia to North Africa, Italy, Spain, France and Germany; from these to Poland, Russia, and eastern Europe generally, ancientharisaism has wandered…demonstrates the enduring importance which attaches to Pharisaism as a religious movement…” The celebrated Rabbi Louis Finkelstein in his great classic quoted from above traces the origin of the form of religious worship practiced today under the present name “Judaism”, to its origin as “Pharisaism” in Judea in the time of Jesus. Rabbi Louis Finkelstein confirms what the eminent Rabbi Adolph Moses states in his great classic “Yahvism, and Other Discourses”, in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi H.G. Enlow, published in 1903 by the Louisville Section of the Council of Jewish Women, in which Rabbi Adolph Moses, on page 1, states: “Among the innumerable misfortunes which have befallen…the most fatal in its consequences is the name Judaism…Worse still, the Jews themselves, who have gradually come to call their religion Judaism…Yet, neither in biblical nor post-biblical, neither in talmudic, nor in much later times, is the term Judaism ever heard…the Bible speaks of the religion…as “Torah Yahve”, the instruction, or the moral law revealed by Yahve…in other places…as “Yirath Yahve”, the fear and reverence of Yahve. These and other appellations CONTINUED FOR MANY AGES TO STAND FOR THE RELIGION…To distinguish it from Christianity and Islam, the Jewish philosophers sometimes designate it as the faith or belief of the Jews…IT WAS FLAVIUS JOSEPHUS, WRITING FOR THE INSTRUCTION OF GREEKS AND ROMANS, WHO COINED THE TERM JUDAISM, in order to pit it against Hellenism…by Hellenism was understood the civilization, comprising language, poetry, religion, art, science, manners, customs, institutions, which…had spread from Greece, its original home, over vast regions of Europe, Asia and Africa…The Christians eagerly seized upon the name…the Jews themselves, who intensely detested the traitor Josephus, refrained from reading his works…HENCE THE TERM JUDAISM COINED BY JOSEPHUS REMAINED ABSOLUTELY UN- KNOWN TO THEM…IT WAS ONLY IN COMPARATIVELY RECENT TIMES, AFTER THE JEWS BECAME FAMILIAR WITH MODERN CHRISTIAN LITERATURE, THAT THEY BEGAN TO NAME THEIR RELIGION JUDAISM.” (emphasis supplied). This statement by the world’s two leading authorities on this subject clearly establishes beyond any question or any doubt that so-called “Judaism” was not the name of any form of religious worship practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus. The Flavius Josephus referred to in the above quotation lived in the 1st century. It was he who coined the word “Judaism” in the 1st century explicitly for the purpose recited clearly above. Religious worship known and practiced today under the name of “Judaism” by so- called or self-styled “Jews” throughout the world was known and practiced in Judea in the time of Jesus under the name “Pharisaism” according to Rabbi Louis Finkelstein, head of the Jewish Theological Seminary of America, and all the other most competent and qualified recognized authorities on the subject. The form of religious worship known as “Pharisaism” in Judea in the time of Jesus was a religious practice based exclusively upon the Talmud. The Talmud in the time of Jesus was the Magna Charta, the Declaration of Independence, the Constitution, and the Bill of Rights, ALL ROLLED INTO ONE, of those who practiced “Pharisaism”. The Talmud today occupies the same relative position with respect to those who profess “Judaism”. The Talmud today virtually exercises totalitarian dictatorship over the lives of so-called or self-styled “Jews” whether they are aware of that fact or not. Their spiritual leaders make no attempt to conceal the control they exercise over the lives of so-called or self-styled “Jews”. They extend their authority far beyond the legitimate limits of spiritual matters. Their authority has no equal outside religion. The role of the Talmud plays in “Judaism” as it is practiced today is officially stated by the eminent Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer, the Director of Inter-religious Activities of the North American Jewish Committee and the President of the Jewish Chaplains Association of the Armed Forces of the United States. In his present capacity as official spokesman for the American Jewish Committee, the self-styled “Vatican of Judaism”, Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer wrote a most revealing and comprehensive article with the title, “What is a Jew” which was published as a feature article in “Look” Magazine in the June 17, 1952 issue. In that article Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer evaluated the significance of the Talmud to “Judaism” today. In that illuminating treatise on that important subject by the most qualified authority, at the time, Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer stated: “The Talmud consists of 63 books of legal, ethical and historical writings of the ancient rabbis. It was edited five centuries after the birth of Jesus. It is a compendium of law and lore. IT IS THE LEGAL CODE WHICH FORMS THE BASIS OF JEWISH RELIGIOUS LAW AND IT IS THE TEXTBOOK USED IN THE TRAINING OF RABBIS.” (emphasis supplied). In view of this official evaluation of the importance of the Talmud in the practice of “Judaism” today by the highest body of so-called or self-styled “Jews” in the world it is very necessary at this time, my dear Dr. Goldstein, to inquire a little further into the subject of the Talmud. In his lifetime the eminent Michael Rodkinson, the assumed name of a so-called or self-styled “Jew” who was one of the world’s great authorities on the Talmud, wrote “History of the Talmud.” This great classic on the subject was written by Michael Rodkinson in collaboration with the celebrated Rabbi Isaac M. Wise. In his “History of the Talmud” Michael Rodkinson, on page 70, states: “Is the literature that Jesus was familiar with in his early years yet in existence in the world? Is it possible for us to get at it? Can we ourselves review the ideas, the statements, the modes of reasoning and thinking, ON MORAL AND RELIGIOUS SUBJECTS, which were current in his time, and MUST HAVE BEEN EVOLVED BY HIM DURING THOSE THIRTY SILENT YEARS WHEN HE WAS PONDERING HIS FUTURE MISSION? To such inquirers the learned class of Jewish rabbis ANSWER BY HOLDING UP THE TALMUD. Here, say they, is THE SOURCE FROM WHENCE JESUS OF NAZARETH DREW THE TEACHINGS WHICH ENABLED HIM TO REVOLUTIONIZE THE WORLD; and the question becomes, therefor, an interesting one TO EVERY CHRISTIAN. What is the Talmud? THE TALMUD, THEN, IS THE WRITTEN FORM OF THAT WHICH, IN THE TIME OF JESUS WAS CALLED THE TRADITION OF THE ELDERS AND TO WHICH HE MAKES FREQUENT ALLUSIONS. What sort of book is it? (emphasis supplied) Stimulated by that invitation every Christian worthy of the name should immediately take the trouble to seek the answer to that “interesting” question “to every Christian”. My dear Dr. Goldstein, your articles do not indicate whether you have taken the time and the trouble to personally investigate “what sort of book” the Talmud is either before or after your conversion to Catholicism. Have you ever done so? If you have done so what is the conclusion you have reached regarding “what sort of book” the Talmud is? What is your personal unbiased and unprejudiced opinion of the Talmud? Is it consistent with your present views as a devout Roman Catholic and a tried and true Christian? Can you spare a few moments to drop me a few lines on your present views? In case you have never had the opportunity to investigate the contents of the “63 books” of the Talmud so well summarized by Rabbi Morris N. Kertzer in his illuminated article “What is a Jew”, previously quoted, may I here impose upon your precious time to quote a few passages for you until you find the time to conveniently investigate the Talmud’s contents personally. If I can be of any assistance to you in doing so please do not hesitate to let me know in what manner you can use my help. From the Birth of Jesus until this day there have never been recorded more vicious and vile libelous blasphemies of Jesus, or Christians and the Christian faith by anyone, anywhere or anytime than you will
      • I will allow this comment this one time, but this site is NOT for copying and pasting propaganda from other sources.

      • oops I forgot to tell you that the tribe Levi was divided equally into all the tribes. The Levitical Priesthood. oh before you go on to think I am an Anti Semite ( thats a stupid law, and the people responsible for such a law as this have absolutely NO Semite blood in them., The Khazers converted to Judaism , in order to be a True Jew is having Noahs son, shem bloodline (incidentally that is where the word Semite comes from )and They dont have any. Its a anti think and the so- called Jews NOT Judah now, but the so-called Jews are Hidden within the Tribe of Judah and Brother Judah always catches the blame for what those so-called Jews, Jesus taught who they are. They are Kenites, descendants of Cain, who is Satans Son, not Eth-Ha-Adam. Judah are the True Jews, The True Jews that are Gods Chosen ONEs. And I am by bloodline a Levy, a little different spelling but the name derives from the Biblical Levi, although by choice a Christian { a mature christian that is merely bringing to you information that happens to be Gods Truth, Do yourself a favor get yourself a Companion KJV authorized Bible and The Exhaustive Strongs Concordance. Those tools are perfectly matched to take you back to the Original Languages of the Holy Bible, (important that it be KJV authorized for it helps to have that book with the concordance so you can look up the meanings of the Hebrew for the Old Testament. and Greek for the New Testament before it was translated to the English. It does matter what religion you happen to be, but it will give you the Truth of Gods Word so that you will know what you are talking about. because reading your input above there are many errors.However here is scripture from John 1,3 = In the beginning was the Word, and the Word was with God, and the Word was God. The word is ….. logos…. Christ Jesus is God,

        2 The same was in the beginning with God.

        3 All things were made by him; and without him was not any thing made that was made.}
        but Judah is only one tribe there are 11 more .. Josephs sons Ephraim and Manassah, Ephraim being given the Kingly Line ever since God promised King David that one of his descendants will Always be on the Kingly Line.. Queen Elizabeth II is a descendant of David, and So is Christ Jesus through Davids son Nathan! They are Blood Relations. But the House of Israel Has the Birthright. House of Israel are the ones that are the Christian Nations… I have another letter for your reading pleasure:

        by COL. GORDON “JACK” MOHR
        For Christ and Country

        How strange it is, that with all the definite and positive assurances in the Word of God as to Israel’s continuance forever as a Nation, there has never been any continued or persistent effort on the part of genuine Bible believers to find them. That they have been content to let them fade away and vanish into nothingness is surely a deep reproach on all true Christians.

        There is, however, one probable explanation. It was GOD’S WILL AND PURPOSE TO HIDE THEM. While the Jews (some of whom are only a part of the House of Judah) occupied the stage, and even called themselves “Israel”, God could work unhindered with and in “Lost Israel”, till he had finished his predetermined work, and without them knowing they were the people of the Book. Only as Israel’s time of punishment had run out, with the whole of God’s purposes at the point of complete fulfillment, was the identity of Israel to become known.

        However, it is a matter of inspired record that God placed “marks” on His people Israel. During the Christian dispensation, Lost Israel was to possess these marks of identification. So then, if we can discover the nations and people with Israel’s marks, we have found the people whom God chose to serve Him to be a channel of blessing to all mankind. The God-given marks are very many, and while the following list is not exhaustive, they constitute a chain of evidence utterly impossible to ignore.

        One race, and one race alone, has all these marks. Nations within this race may have only a portion of them, but the race as a whole has them all. With a few exceptions, Joseph (the birthright nation) was the recipient of them all. By inheritance, his two sons, Ephraim (Great Britain) and Manasseh (U.S.A.) will be found possessing them all.

        While Israelites remain in other countries, America is the home of millions of all the thirteen tribes (one out of many) and thus is representative of the whole House of Jacob. We are bound by Israel’s responsibilities; fulfilling Israel’s destiny. The MARKS are on us everywhere; in our NAME; in our SABBATH; in our INSTITUTIONS; in our PHILANTHROPY; in our COMMERCE; in our WEALTH; in our MINES; in our AGRICULTURE; in our CHURCHES; in our MISSIONARY ENTERPRISES; in our ARMED FORCES; in our POSSESSION OF THE BIBLE: – all BIRTHMARKS, which neither time, nor the ages, nor even our sin can wipe out.

        1. Israel to be great and mighty nation. Gen. 12:2; 18:18; Deut. 4:7,8.

        2. Israel to have multitudinous seed. Gen. 13:16; 15:5; 22:17; 24:60; 26:4, 24; 28:3, 14; 32:12; 49:22; Isa. 10:22; Hos. 1:10; Zech. 10:7,8.

        3. Israel to spread abroad to the West, East, North and South. Gen. 28:14; Isa. 42:5, 6.

        4. Israel to have a new home. 2nd Sam. 7:10; 1st Chron. 17:9.

        5. Israel’s home to be north-west of Palestine. Isa. 49:12; Jer. 3:18.

        6. Israel to live in islands and coasts of the earth. Isa. 41:1; 49:1-3; 51:5; Jer. 31:7-10.

        7. Israel to become a company of nations. Gen. 17:4-6, 15,16; 35:11; 48:19; Eph. 2:12.

        8. Israel to have a Davidic King (a perpetual monarchy within Israel). 2nd Sam. 7:13,19; 1st Chron. 22:10; 2nd Chron. 13:5; Psa. 89:20, 37; Eze. 37:24; Jer. 33:17, 21, 26.

        9. Israel to colonize and spread abroad. Gen. 28:14; 49:22; Deut. 32:8; 33:17; Psa. 2:8; Isa. 26:15; 27:6; 54:2; Zech. 10:8,9.

        10. Israel to colonize the desolate place of the earth. Isa. 35:1; 43:19, 20; 49:8; 54:3; 58:11, 12.

        11. Israel to lose a colony, then expand, demanding more room. Isa. 49:19, 20.

        12. Israel to have all the land needed. Deut. 32:8.

        13. Israel to be the first among the nations. Gen. 27:29; 28:13; Jer. 31:7.

        14. Israel to continue as a nation forever. 2nd Sam. 7:16, 24, 29; 1st Chron. 17:22-27; Jer. 31:35-37.

        15. Israel’s home to be invincible to outside forces. 2nd Sam. 7:10; Isa. 41:11-14.

        16. Israel to be undefeatable – defended by God. Num. 24:8, 9; Isa. 15-17; Micah 5:8, 9.

        17. Israel to be God’s instrument in destroying evil. Jer. 51:20; 51:19-24; Dan. 2:34, 35.

        18. Israel to have a land of great mineral wealth. Gen. 49:25, 26; Deut. 8:9; 33:15-19.

        19. Israel to have a land of great agricultural wealth. Gen. 27:28; Deut. 8:7, 9; 28:11; 33:13, 14, 28.

        20. Israel to be rich by trading. Isa. 60:5-11; 61:6.

        21. Israel to be envied and feared by all nations. Deut. 2:25; 4:8; 28:10; Isa. 43:4; 60:10, 12; Micah 7:16, 17; Jer. 33:9.

        22. Israel to lend to other nations, borrowing of none. Deut. 15:6; 28.12.

        23. Israel to have a new name. Isa. 62:2; 65:15; Hos. 2:17.

        24. Israel to have a new language. Isa. 28:11 (The Bible, by means of which God speaks now to Israel, is English not Hebrew).

        25. Israel to possess the gates of his enemies. Gen. 22:17.

        26. Israel to find the aborigines diminishing before them. Deut. 33:17; Isa. 60:12.

        27. Israel to have control of the seas. Deut. 33:19; Num. 24:7; Psa. 89:25; Isa. 60:5 (F. Fenton translates this last, “when rolls up to you all the wealth of the sea”. That could not be unless Israel controlled it).

        28. Israel to have a new religion (New Covenant.) Heb. 8:10-13; 9:17; Matt. 10:5-7; Luke 1:77; 2:32; 22:20; John 11:49-52; Gal. 3:13.

        29. Israel to lose all trace of her lineage. Isa. 42:16-19; Hos. 1:9, 10; 2:6; Rom. 11:25.

        30. Israel to keep Sabbath forever (one day in seven set aside). Ex. 31:13, 16, 17; Isa. 58:13, 14.

        31. Israel to be called the sons of God (i.e., accept Christianity). Hos. 1:10-11.

        32. Israel to be a people saved by the Lord. Deut. 33:27-29; Isa. 41:8-14; 43:1-8;44:1-3;49:25, 26; 52:1-12; 55:3-10, 13; Jer. 46:27, 28; Eze. 34:10-16; Hos. 2:23; 13:9-14; 14:4, 6.

        33. Israel to be the custodians of the Oracles (Scriptures) of God. Psa. 147:19, 21; Isa. 59-21.

        34. Israel to carry the Gospel to all the world. Gen. 28:14; Isa. 43:10-12 (witnesses), 21; Micah 5:7.

        35. Israel to be kind to the poor and set slaves free. Deut. 15:7, 11; Psa. 72:4; Isa. 42:7; 49:9; 58:6.

        36. Israel to be the heir of the world. Rom. 4:13.

        37. Israel to be God’s Glory. Isa. 46:13; 49:3; 60:1, 2.

        38. Israel to possess God’s Holy Spirit as well as His Word. Isa. 44:3; 59:21; Hagg. 2:5.

        39. Israel to be God’s Heritage, formed by God, forever. Deut. 4:20; 7:6; 14:2; 2nd Sam. 7:23; 1st Kings 8:51, 53; Isa. 43:21; 54:5-10; Hos. 2:19, 23; Joel 2:27; Micah 7:14 -18.

        40. Israel is the nation appointed to bring glory to God. Isa. 41:8-16; 43:10, 21; 44:23; 49:3.





        It is needless to point out that the impostor nation of so-called Israel today in Palestine fulfills none of the Bible’s above prophecies of the Israel of God. And if not of God, whence come they? And if from the devil, then why are Christians (Christian Zionists and Judeo-Christians) supporting the lie in defiance of God’s Word? Answer: they are apart and away from God and are not following Him, they have grabbed a hold of the skirts of the antichrists. The International Judaics have usurped true Israel’s identity so that the non-Hebrew Khazars have been taken by the Christian churches to be God’s chosen people Israel. And having disguised themselves as God’s chosen they have placed themselves in Israel’s place in the prophecies, so as to profane and pervert the below Scripture, for instance—just as satan shall do when he disguises himself as the true Lord during the Tribulation.

        Zech 8:23
        23 Thus saith the Lord of hosts; In those days it shall come to pass, that ten men shall take hold out of all languages of the nations, even shall take hold of the skirt of him that is a Jew, saying, We will go with you: for we have heard that God is with you. KJV

        This should have (and would have) been fulfilled at the Advent of Christ, but they murdered Him on the cross instead, thus forfeiting the worldly Kingdom that He was to lead as Ezekiel’s etc. prophecies spoke of. In regards this hitherto “unconventional” position, see our:

        What Christ’s First Advent changed: Why Ezekiel chapters 40-48 won’t happen. (with a closing word to the Judaics).

        …is Ezekiel 44 in the Millennium?

        More on Ezekiel 44 NOT being the Millennium; More on the so-called “second chance doctrine.”

        More on Ezekiel’s Kingdom not being the Millennium of Revelation 20.

        But it (the subservience to the “Jews”) may be mimicked as an impersonated “type” during the Tribulation. The religious “Jews” (Talmudists) of today long for this Scripture to be fulfilled shortly in them; and it forms the foundation for their Noahide Laws (seven main laws [and hundreds of minor laws] for “Gentiles” under their endtime servitude to the “Jews,” as the Jewish Talmud reports). Note: at the aforementioned Talmud Noahide Laws link, see ¶4 (paragraph 4) for the sentence for violating the Noahide Laws—beheading! Then compare that to the Tribulation beheadings mentioned in Revelation 20:4 and fill in the blanks. However, the god of the Jews (and the world) in the Tribulation shall not be the Lord God but rather shall be satan in disguise; i.e., the antichrist as seen sitting in power impersonating God in 2nd Thes 2:4, and shown as the second beast, “another beast”, in Rev 13:11ff.

        Anyway, that is what wolves in sheep’s clothing do, they are impostors, and they sneak into the flock through subterfuge and in disguise so as to slaughter the chosen flock, God’s good Christians of all stripes.

        Acts 20:28-30
        28 Take heed therefore unto yourselves, and to all the flock, over the which the Holy Ghost hath made you overseers, to feed the church of God, which he hath purchased with his own blood.
        29 For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock.
        30 Also of your own selves shall men arise, speaking perverse things, to draw away disciples after them. KJV

        2 Cor 11:13-15
        13 For such are false apostles, deceitful workers, transforming [disguise – Grk. #3345] themselves into the apostles of Christ.
        14 And no marvel; for Satan himself is transformed [disguise – Grk. #3345] into an angel of light.
        15 Therefore it is no great thing if his ministers also be transformed [disguise – Grk. #3345] as the ministers of righteousness; whose end shall be according to their works. KJV

        transforming/ed: Greek word #3345 metaschematizo (met-askh-ay-mat-id’-zo); from NT:3326 and a derivative of NT:4976; to transfigure or disguise; figuratively, to apply (by accommodation): KJV – transfer, transform (self).

        Peace to you in Christ Jesus. I pray that you don’t take this the wrong way. I was just being truthful, and I didnt want to hurt anyones feelings or offend others. If you think I did, It was never my intention to cause any discord among brethren.

  5. Oh geez…that star inverted is the satanic one, not that one! If that would have been the case, when Governor Palin visited Israel they would’ve had a major fit. Not even the PM and his wife minded. On the contrary I never saw them so happy in months!

  6. Back to the subject…lol…the poem is BEAUTIFUL!!!

  7. As it says in the bible God loves ZION more than he loves Israel and he does not plan to build his City of Enlightenment spoken about by Prophet Isaiah in Israel. God as chosen a different country to build his new holy city of New Jerusalem.

    As far as the big Apple is concerned e,.g. the USA.

    The Heavenly Father warned ‘An Apple a day will not save the day, do not count on them’.

    • Eliakim

      Zion is in Israel. God does not change his mind or declare his Word void. He will build the holy city exactly where he said he would – in Israel.

    • no he didnt. Gods favorite place in the whole universe is Jersalem. And that is where Christ Jesus will return touching down on Mt Olives, which I believe is the same as Mt Sion or Zion. That is where God will sent up His Kingdom. Not any other place. I dont mean to sound or be rude to you, but Where on Earth did you hear That from? Thats False Teaching! And God Hates that. the first place that gets judged is at the Pulpit! There are far too many false teaching, and false prophets. You best get yourself the same books that I mentioned earlier. To know the Truth or Gods Word and to know the signs of the Apostacy and the Great Tribulation of Satan, who will stand in the Holy Place claiming to be God. and Most People that are not sealed with Gods Truth, God will let you be decieved by the anti(instead f) Christ. The only people that get tormented by satan and his fallen angels, and his children will not be Sealed with Gods Word. The Old and The new testament the Whole Book. That is if you dont want to be deceived into worshipping the false god. I am not sure if this is a strictly Judah website but it will not hurt to learn truth you know. In the end of all of it, Everyone will kneel, Everyone will confess that Christ Jesus is God. so its not too late to learn but time is running low… Pray thee for the Love of God. I am warning you all for only yourselves. Why would you want to not believe God. I dont know anyone here, and I am not, I repeat not trying to offend you all, nor convert you but since when does it hurt to know what will happen from God to you? You can have peace of mind just knowing that if you study and shew yourself approved God could open your eyes and ears so you will be able to understand. If only I reach just One person , then it is worth it!!

  8. The poem speaks to my heart – from a gentile. I am not worried because God is in heaven and we are on earth and God has many wondrous secrets weknow not of. One thing I do know, the joy of a Jewish lady when she accepted the Messiah, through words the Holy Spirit gave me – we are one people in Christ – Jahweh is awesome – there is none like Him and His love is eternal

    • a what? who is a gentile? How do you know that person is a gentile? what if he/she is one of Gods Chosen? The House of Judah is one One tribe. there are more that Judah! judah and benjimin <—– House of Judah, (true Jews)

      House of Israel is the Christian Nations. who is a Gentile? the Khazers are. they lie and say they are Jews and call us vile names , like GoYIM. and other vulgaries. are you one of those? Because Khazers are the REAL Gentiles. Not even the Saudi s are Gentiles. Ishmael. God promised Ishmael Palenstine! and the Jew allowed it to stay in the jurisdiction of Mount Sinai thats Saudis jurisdiction. So why is the Country Israel fighting and killing innocent people for. God promised it to Ishmael who's father was Abram before it was Abramham.

      • a gentile is anyone who is not a descendant of Isaac..and that includes Ishmael and all the arabs, and all the descendants of Japeth, and Ham ( sons of Noah).

        Back in Jesus time, and in the early time of the apostles, the church was made of jews……

        so anyone who was not part of the church was considered a ” jew who was not a real jew” was ANYONE who did not believe in the Messiah…..the actual jewish population that rejected their messiah was considered the synogogue of satan…

        the khazers are just one small population of people that people have picked out to criticize……


        If someone converts to judaism, then they are jewish.

        Ruth in the bible, ancestor of king david, was a gentile who converted to judaism…..

  9. This is beautiful. Thanks for sharing

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: