God shuts down the LHC at Cern

 

 

clip_image002

-

So funny!! 

Scientists are trying to create God, and He shuts down the LHC, so they can’t.

This reminds me of the Tower of Babel. God shut that down too.

-

clip_image004

-

1. The Anti-miracle- bad luck – either from the future, or from “eternity”

References – Read about it:

http://www.nytimes.com/2009/10/13/science/space/13lhc.html?_r=2&scp=3&sq=overbye&st=cse

http://blogs.reuters.com/faithworld/2009/10/13/did-god-stop-cern-from-discovering-the-god-particle/

Excerpts:

The collider, the world’s largest particle accelerator turned on with great fanfare in September 2008 by the European Organisation for Nuclear Research (CERN), was closed down for major repairs just over a week later. (It has been shut down ever since.)

The 3 billion-euro collider was supposed to track down the Higgs boson, a subatomic particle believed to have given mass to the universe milliseconds after the Big Bang created it some 15 billion years ago.

Physicists think this minuscule speck of matter, if ever found, could explain the mysterious code at the origin of the physical world.

When the CERN collider was first turned on, a connection between two magnets vaporized, shutting down the collider for more than a year….

It seemed to be jinxed.

Dr. Nielson said, “Well, one could even almost say that we have a model for God.” It is their guess, he went on, “that He rather hates Higgs particles, and attempts to avoid them.”

This malign influence from the future, they argue, could explain why the United States Superconducting Supercollider, also designed to find the Higgs, was canceled in 1993 after billions of dollars had already been spent, an event so unlikely that Dr. Nielsen calls it an “anti-miracle.”

A pair of otherwise distinguished physicists have suggested that the hypothesized Higgs boson, which physicists hope to produce with the collider, might be so abhorrent to nature that its creation would ripple backward through time and stop the collider before it could make one, like a time traveler who goes back in time to kill his grandfather.

-

-

clip_image006

-

2. Story donated by Abigail – a little birds drops crumbs into the LHC and stops it again!!

This bird knew exactly where to pick up the crumb which would AGAIN stop the L.H.C.

And I saw him early in the morning when this blue jay proudly picked up the crumb from my neighbors’ table and flew away.

The Lord is GOOOOd!!!

Here is the story of where this crumb was dropped.

http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,572567,00.html?test=latestnews

-

-

-

Maybe they need this bird on their staff. Its name is Einstein.

-

-


52 Responses to “God shuts down the LHC at Cern”

  1. The only way to acceess God is the path shown by the prophets and Jesus Christ, all other attempts to access other dimensions/wormholes/metaphysical worlds can only give access ONLY to demonic dimension or to hell itself.

    • Let’s narrow things down a little bit (you know, so we can all fit into YOUR reality)…of all the vast and limitless real estate God created…only one planet and your religion are the “correct” ones. This could be funny….but it is too tragic for that to happen….

      • dear indigo

        God created a very vast creation, and we are only discovering now just a tiny bit of it.

        To say one planet is the “correct one” would not make much sense. There are millions of stars, solar systems, planets, etc. Anything God creates is “correct.”

        As far as religion, there is only one God and Creator, and only one Truth. Different religions attempt to seek the truth, so this is why God sent Jesus (Yeshua) to make the truth clear.

        If you follow his teachings, you will find God’s truth that was brought to earth.

        If you follow another religion, then you might only have a piece of the truth, or may have none at all.

        It was a great act of love by God to provide a Messiah to help man find the truth, to find forgiveness, holiness, and hope for a greater, eternal future.

        If you do not know Jesus as your savior and redeemer, I encourage you to seek Him today.

  2. Now 2 physicist think the bird came from the future.
    http://www.time.com/time/health/article/0,8599,1937370,00.html
    They should try to understand the space traveller can travel both space and time.
    Why limit God?

  3. Look up….. our redeemer comes with power. Come Lord, come soon. May God bless each of you. My heart is so touched by you continuing onward.
    Its the small things in God’s creation that puts man to shame.

  4. scientists are clearly not trying to create god. the scientists using this language are using it metaphorically. just as they have translated technical language and maths (one form of metaphor) into religious language (another form of metaphor) in order to explain their ideas in laymans terms. “a gateway into hell” is nonsense because it cannot be reasonably expected to correlate to an existent entity- unless you intend it to signify something which can be more precisely signified by a term like “black hole” in which case, your choice of language only serves to give you away as a simpleton, still trapped in the shallows of a more primitive episteme.

  5. if you find this at all interesting i strongly encourage you to find a copy of arthur koestler’s book ‘the act of creation’ from amazon. it explains the basic principles which guide the mind of both the mystic and the scientist- brilliantly explaining how one gradually evolved into the other (with various sections applying the same theory to explanations of laughter, literature, drama, poetry, painting etc.) it’s an incredible read.

  6. i’ve just looked on amazon and it seems hard to find, it must be available somewhere on the internet i imagine.

  7. LOL! ONE little birdie shut down this whole operation! hehe… that was great…Thank you for posting this Marianne… Happy Monday and have a great week! Love,Cat

  8. One can not say if Dr. Nielsen’s “model-for-God-comment” was a serious one (refering to the fact that a lot of scientists are atheists).
    Anyway: God did not shut down CERN. It was just a matter of technical failure – which means: the experts flunked it.

    • hi philgeland

      I agree with your comment.

      For people who do not believe in God, they somehow have to either bring up His name, or try to recreate Him in a particle. They unconsciously know he exists, or the thought of Him would never come up.

      That is part of what is so funny about it.

  9. in response to zarathustra’s comments, scientists are not trying to create god because they all already think they are gods…look at the millions drug companies rake in, they play with peoples lives and if they cant afford it tough!
    and have you not got it the wrong way round re religious language turned into maths, the bible code theory is based the other way round and proves there is order in chaos theory.
    obviously you have never encountered a ghost or something that couldnt be explained hence your small mindedness that anyone who has a belief in anything is a simpleton! there are things like that out there, even einstein knew there was a 4th dimension!! which his theories and quantum mechanics have proved. and if einstein didnt have a great mind to think laterally and outside the box he would never have come up with his theories. in fact most of the people who came up with great ideas like ‘the world is round’ were laughed at in their day….who’s laughing now? this shows you simply psychologically project your own small narrowed minded views onto others
    and yes i do come from a scientific background, and if science is so great why cant they find a cure for arthritis? one of the oldest medical conditions around, why cant they explain in detail why acupuncture or general anaesthetics work? why do they say we started as monkeys/neanderthals yet they cant explain how the egyptians, mayans etc had such a vast knowledge (mathematical etc) long before they expected that technology to exist?
    how narrow minded and simpleton minded it is to think there is little else that exists except what can be seen and explained in this world alone….

  10. A beatiful bird with a lot of love

  11. it was quite interesting to read they have experiments like this going on, when they blame ‘global warming’ for the ozone problem. i watched a programme the other night about freak weather and changes on the earth to do with its magnetic field and polarity which has always been somewhat stabilized by the iron core which is liquid, if they are messing about with magnets etc on this size of scale is it any wonder everythings being messed up?????

    i also found it quite interesting they were relating it to the ‘iron core’ is it that we have taken so much stuff out of the earths surface like iron, etc that its gone a bit off and wasnt it mentioned in daniel about ‘ a god of fortresses’ interesting that we use so much iron and steel and metal in buildings of today!

    just one of those ‘lateral thinking’ moments lol!

    • Your burbly V8 Suburban has nothing to do with global warming…just as the ozone layer and CO2 has little to do with it. When I hugged my tree this morning, she shaid she was thankful for every CO2 molecule coming her way. It does her foliage better than Pantene could add lustre to my wife’s hair.

      Global warming is a scientific fact, described in the very scientific book of Revelation (read below.) God’s prophecies are an exact science and science could learn from His wisdom.

      Just look at GLOBAL WARMING foretold:
      7  And a voice came from the altar, saying, Even so, O Lord God, Ruler of all, true and full of righteousness is your judging.
      8  ¶And the fourth let what was in his vessel come out on the sun; and power was given to it that men might be burned with fire.
      9  And men were burned with great heat: and they said evil things against the name of the God who has authority over these punishments; and they were not turned from their evil ways to give him glory.
      Revelation 16

  12. i wonder how much effort God exerted doing these?….

    http://www.postimage.org/image.php?v=gx1G8GWS

    or does He?

  13. my point about scientific language (which you ignored) was that it is just as subject to the limits of language (e.g. a system of symbols without objective meaning like any other) as the mythological language which used to serve the same purpose. science relies on the same processes of creativity and reverting to the ‘dream’ state as those of the philosopher and the artist. discovering the world was round was a matter of bisociating two entirely different matrices of thought- a feat which utilised ‘inspiration’ not ‘logic’. many scientists receive the inspiration for their theories in dreams- as was the case with one discovery of molecular structure in which the scientists involved repeatedly dreamed of snakes biting their own tales- until one day he bisociated the matrices of his dream with his work and discovered the circular structure he was looking for. einstein famously thought in colours and shapes- only translating his discoveries into maths and language after he had discovered what he was looking for.
    i have encountered plenty of things which can’t be explained- this is due to the fact that nothing can be explained. every explanation- whether in scientific language or religious- is imperfect. whether you say you have encountered “a ghost” or a “spirit’ or a “delusion” or a “toaster” makes no difference. you are attempting to describe the same experience whichever you choose. you will never create the same experience in another person’s mind, they will interpret the words and expressions you choose and summon up their own idea of what you experienced based on their own past experience.
    if we were both standing outside one night in a particular state of mind and we saw a shared dead friend walking towards us, i imagine you would describe it as a ghost. if you imagine you live in a world of “ghosts” this is the way you will choose to decode the sensory data you come across- there is no such thing as ‘pure’ phenomenological experience, it will be interpreted through the lens of superstition. if i choose to describe the same experience as an episode of madness, i am equally right to do so. neither of us is ‘right’. except that in a more lucid state of mind i am capable of reading various works of psychology and neuroscience which provide me with a language in which to understand what happened more fully- i can only look to my feelings of a miraculous unveiling of ‘truth’ when i read these passages to prove that they are closer to the truth than yours. that and the fact that my interpretation explains yours and yours does not explain mine. of course i wouldn’t be so foolish as to claim that ‘ghosts do not exist’, the concept of a ghost exists in my imagination- if i were to apply it to an experience and subconsciously experience that experience as an instance of the concept of ghost then for me it would exist. i just think that there is a more accurate language in which those experiences can be described which rings more strongly with my experience.
    and the same goes for the mythological language of theology.

    please do find arthur koestler’s book ‘the act of creation’, it elucidates the process by which wild speculation gradually became demonstrable and subsequently receded back into a kind of neo-mythology. amongst other things.

    • Z

      one descriptive system, then, is no more valid than another.

      But you are saying the imagination of science, when it is expressed, is reality, but the imagination, as you call inspiration, or the realm of the spirit, is just mythology.

      This is inconsistent, and illogical.

    • Language is a creation of God and He encoded it in all His Creations and that includes
      all levels.
      Without a knowledge of the Hebrew language everything is viewed through a distorted lens.

  14. One of the best definitions of “power” that I’ve come across is the ability to explain phenomena. To assert that concepts or the perception of phenomena absent of objectivity is unprovable isnt incorrect, just inaccurate. The very notion of God, however one might perceive him or choose to deny his existence is one resounding exception to this assertion. That God, invisible and often only tangentially influential (most with a concept of God perceive his actions through the objects he influences as in the argument of the Prime Mover) remains indelible in human thought and expression is undeniable. Whether or not one believes in God, he or she is certain to understand what is meant or assumed by “God”. Even without a formal, universal conceptualization, God remains. Thats more than can be said for the ridiculous, grotesque “flying spaghetti monster”. The absence of a formal, universal conceptualization or for that matter, a singular definable, repeatable conceptualization as in one scientist or a team of scientists defining based on preconceived metrics, the hypothesized HB particle, doesnt work so well in many other cases. Without thinking TOO hard, I cant think of ANY other salient examples where this is not the case. Our scientists, or team, while searching for an invisible, previously non existent (at least in the minds of science) particle, happen upon an object they think fits the bill. Equipped with the metrics that their theorization has provided, how do they then prove to other scientists that this is in fact the straight dope? Their language and concepts are impotent in this case. They can no more prove their absentee particle is real than the aforementioned Spaghetti Monster. The existence of God disproves your position or rather, puts a finer point on it.

  15. Wow!
    When the secrets of the Big Bang are finaly revealed, we can all say, “A little birdie told me”
    Crumbs, did I say that?

  16. amardo, that was an incredibly spurious paragraph. using needlessly innapropriate language and nebulous strings of ‘logic’ is no proof of anything.

    god= something greater than it is possible for us to explain, percieve, etc.

    therefore god equalls the unknown but can be accessed through feelings of the numinous as experienced in nature, looking at the stars, pyschoactive drugs, orgasm etc.

    i have experienced all of these things, have often had a strong sense that there is an order to events which goes profoundly beyond cause and effect. calling this ‘the unknown’ or ‘the mystery’ or ‘the numinous’ is great. calling this ‘god’ is great, they are all words pertaining to the same concept.

    as soon as a definition of god becomes any more specific than ‘the great unknown’ however, it tarnishes the purity of the concept. a personable god who talks to people, has a son, sends angels out on errands, this is all fine as metaphor for numinous experience- just as good a metaphor as you might find in a host of other books, the paranoia of gravity’s rainbow for instance.

    believing these things to be literaly true requires something to go a little bit wrong in the brain, “applying the logic of dreams to the substance of the waking world” i believe is something like how foucault puts it.

  17. I saw on the news today they are getting ready to crank it up again. Wonder what happens next?

  18. plenty of people have met him, plenty of people lack a high enough capacity for thought to question their assumptions.

    • hi z

      so we finally agree on something….that “plenty of people have met Him” …if him is God…..the question is….

      do they believe their experience, or do they question him, and turn him into an “assumption.?”

      If we cannot trust a direct observation, which is a definition of a tangible fact, then what other information can we trust?

      • Hi Gavriel
        What can one say but YES and AMEN. I am a ‘solo-flyer’, have no one to share and exchange these things about God. but now have company through this website and the Readers REPLY service. Glory to God !
        Ed

      • Marianne
        We are into deep things. I found how to find God, that my heart FEELS and through my, sort of electric feelings I can communicate my thoughts to Him and after feel satisfied. Sometimes when I am too hasty, nothing happens in return. (I watched on TV, how Clairvoyants can see and feel…say the missing person even when they are dead. So electricity is an everlasting thing – and God therefore knows where people are and what they think,- and when the body is dead not so their SOUL, – He directs them into a suitable habitation to wait for the resurrection. Isa.14:18 says “All the kings of the nations..lie in glory, everyone in his own house”, ‘but Luci is down in the stones of the pit’. So the deceased don’t just lie piled-up below the ground a la Michael Angelo. Some live in their spirt/ghostly houses/palaces ?? I even heard that a person I knew is content and goes fishing !?? mad or not ? I don’t joke.
        Ed

  19. It is so funny some of this stuff. This machine trying to prove that the earth was made by little particles forming over billions of years. Yes they were formed by particles, but it happened in only a few days or was it a day to create the heavens and the earth? I also find it funny that they compare humans to monkeys and say we evolved from them. Well why are monkeys still monkeys? Why didn’t they evolve to? Doesn’t make sense. I also heard something about our supposed ancestors being fish at one point, why are there still fish? See, these people talk about us coming from no where and evolving from animal to human but then they don’t make any sense. Why do we have animals? Souldn’t they all have evolved? Why have we stayed human for so long? Why aren’t we still evolving? We’ve been just as smart throughout the life of the earth but only recently has our knowledge increased so rapidly. I find a lot of this very interesting, can be a little scary but interesting and I know it is true.

  20. denise’s comment is the standard level of discussion on this forum, assuming that because you don’t understand something- due to not being interested enough to spend any time whatsoever attempting to discover some kind of ‘truth’- no one else could possibly understand it either. i do not claim to be an expert on evolution, this is why i cannot begin to argue the contrary, my only option is to make no conclusions whatsoever apart from more or less trusting the sources which i feel to be closest to the truth.

    so who should we trust?

    the people who are telling you this stuff about the flaws in evolution are not trying to explain the mechanism of evolution- they are attempting to shore up their paradigm of a benevolent creator.

    the proper approach is to tackle the problem of how the mechanism works with no over-arching ideological aim. darwin himself was a strong christian who originally aimed to show the glory of god’s creation in his work, he struggled with his faith and delayed publication of his ideas for years (due to fear of public backlash) before finally admitting that the evidence was far too strong to be denied.

    doubtless there are flaws in the theory of evolution- there are flaws in any and every theory- however, it is simply opinionated ignorance to claim both that this is the case AND that these flaws are sufficient to disprove a well established and thoroughly peer reviewed theory. jumping to conclusions before attempting to properly examine the facts leads to the WORST human behavior. if you are ignorant or unsure of something- assert nothing too strongly. it’s better to hold no beliefs or opinions at all than to pick them almost at random with no process of questioning.

    thus spake zarathustra

    • hi z

      My objection to evolution is that, considering the complexity of the universe and life, it is statistically impossible for it to have “evolved,” no matter how much time you allow for it to occur. Also, where did the starting materials come from?

      It violates the observable law of thermodynamics, that all things tend toward chaos, not order.

    • PS

      Although she speaks in conversational style, Denise is a highly educated woman of science.

  21. http://www.bbc.co.uk/iplayer/episode/b00p29kc/The_Infinite_Monkey_Cage_Episode_1/

  22. Must view!

  23. Must see!
    http://pindz.blogspot.com/2009/12/ufo-hessedalen-norway-clip-alien-bases.html

  24. Here is the article in the Sun British newspaper.
    Very important to note as I think it most certainly with the LHC.
    But I may be wrong,
    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2764647/Spiral-UFO-puts-Norway-in-a-spin.htmlong!
    Either way I think this is urgent!

  25. Let’s try that again …

    http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/2764647/Spiral-UFO-puts-Norway-in-a-spin.html

    • warning?
      -
      -

      Isa 51:6 Lift up your eyes to the heavens, and look upon the earth beneath: for the heavens shall vanish away like smoke, and the earth shall wax old like a garment, and they that dwell therein shall die in like manner: but my salvation shall be for ever, and my righteousness shall not be abolished.
      -
      -

      Joe 2:30 And I will shew wonders in the heavens and in the earth, blood, and fire, and pillars of smoke.
      -
      -

      2Pe 3:12 Looking for and hasting unto the coming of the day of God, wherein the heavens being on fire shall be dissolved, and the elements shall melt with fervent heat?
      -
      -

      Rev 12:12 …. Woe to the inhabiters of the earth and of the sea! for the devil is come down unto you, having great wrath, because he knoweth that he hath but a short time.

      • The devil is receiving his Nobel Peace Prize Tomorrow in Norway. :)
        Just making fun.
        There were news releases today the LHC were successful in collisions.
        As though there are not enough collisions here on earth amongst us. LOL

        Maybe it is a warning?
        Or a projection of a real stargate or unreal … preparing the world to hear
        Obama’s declaration that aliens are real.
        And maybe they are real?
        Too many sightings to dismiss.
        Norway seems to be a place haunting with UFO.

        Who knows? But don’t trust the empire to tell you what it is. :)

  26. Here is the article concerning CERN.
    http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20091209/ap_on_sc/eu_big_bang_machine
    I wonder if the times correlates ?

    • not sure, but i noticed that they are planning to increase the power from 1.18 Tev to 3.5 Tev next year. That might be more electricity/power than the whole earth uses at one time.

  27. Incongruous statue of Kali at front door Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

    secretsun.blogspot.com/2009/01/astronaut-theology-india-rising.html

    Could LHC be modern device for sacred cow (=astral projection) idolatry?

  28. Hadron Collider back up and running

  29. SCIENCE NEWS

    Glitches delay collisions at Big Bang experiment
    By Robert Evans Posted 2010/03/30 at 5:50 am EDT

    GENEVA, Mar. 30, 2010 (Reuters) — Physicists at the CERN research center delayed attempts on Tuesday to create mini-versions of the Big Bang after what they called minor technical problems blocked the launch of the marathon experiment.
    …same thing. picture does not print out….

    http://www.newsdaily.com/stories/tre62m2ks-us-cern/

  30. note from dorien:

    It’s about the Hadron Collider in Switzerland. After they reopened the installation on September 11th, 2009 remarkable things started to happen on earth:

    CNN reported on that day: “A magnitude 6.9 earthquake rattled Japan on Thursday, within minutes of a magnitude 6.6 earthquake in Indonesia, the U.S. Geological Survey said”.

    Text under video reads: “Yes it sounds too good to be true but it’s right here!The LHC is definitely a device for breaking through the Van Allen Belt. What you will see in this video is astounding. There are brazen masonic clues”.

    I wonder: Earthquakes open the earth’s crust. Could it be that it causes evil spirits to come out of the earth, and into our world?

    Here’s the video:

  31. This reminds me of a very Godly monk–I think it was Bernard of Clairvaux–he lived during the Middle Ages. He was very devoted to the Lord, but he was making changes in the monastery that the other monks did not like (it was probably exposing their sin or convicting them of sin). So some monks poisoned his bread so that he would die.

    As Bernard sat down to eat his meal, a raven flew into the dining hall and stole the poisoned bread and then flew back out.

    The Lord always has the last laugh.

  32. Man in his arrogance once again thinks he is the master of the universe and has built technology that is beyond his understanding or control which will cause great suffering upon the earth and all those who dwell upon it. This has happened before around 10,000-12,000 BC when Atlantis was using powerful technology they could not control causing the tectonic plates to crack, which caused the flood of Noah. The earth has a magnetic field/CERN has a magnetic field(opposites attract/ like REPEL). Since they turned on Cern the earthquakes all over the earth have increased in numbers and strength making the plates unstable. You do not need to have a PHd to understand cause and effect/action and reaction. Man has and always will cause his own demise, without any outside help. History always repeats itself, this has happened before. The Creator gave us free will to choose our own path, whatever direction we choose to follow that is our reward. There are “COSMIC LAWS” that govern all time and space and cannot be altered, changed, or manipulated by any human/alien races and those who try are quickly reminded that there are powerful beings out there that keep balance in the universe and are not mocked. I have spoken what I know to be true, walk in the light. Truth, Light, Love, Peace.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

 
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,584 other followers

%d bloggers like this: